Page 77 - Defrosting for Air Source Heat Pump
P. 77

68                                          Defrosting for Air Source Heat Pump


          Table 3.7 Differences between two-circuit and three-circuit outdoor coil experiments
                                              Two-circuit      Three-circuit
          Item   Parameter                    outdoor coil     outdoor coil

          1      Total case number            2                3
          2      Defrosting duration without trays  152 s      186 s
          3      Defrosting duration with trays  136 s         168 s
          4      Reduction in defrosting duration  16 s (15.8%)  18 s (7.5%)
                 after using trays
          5      Total melted frost collected  620 g           921 g
                 without trays
          6      Total melted frost collected with  655 g      969 g
                 trays
          7      Melted frost collected difference  35 g (5.3%)  48 g (5.0%)
          8      Total energy consumed without  576 kJ         727 kJ
                 trays
          9      Total energy consumed with trays  517 kJ      652 kJ
          10     Total energy saved after trays used  59 kJ (10.3%)  75 kJ (10.4%)
          11     Defrosting efficiency with trays  52.5%       43.5%
          12     Defrosting efficiency without trays  63.0%    56.7%
          13     Defrosting efficiency improved  10.5%         13.2%
                 after trays used


         3.4   Concluding remarks


         The experimental results and corresponding quantitative analysis reported in this
         chapter demonstrated the negative effects of allowing melted frost to flow downward
         due to gravity over the airside surface of experimental vertical two-circuit and three-
         circuit outdoor coils in an ASHP unit on defrosting performance during RCD: a longer
         defrosting duration and more energy consumption. Furthermore, the study results
         also suggested that the use of water-collecting trays was effective in mitigating the
         negative effects.
            For two-circuit and three-circuit outdoor coils, the increases in defrosting effi-
         ciency values are different, at 10.5% and 13.2%, respectively. That means the energy
         performance could be improved more obviously for a three-circuit outdoor coil
         after using the water-collecting trays. Additionally, for a three-circuit outdoor coil,
         a greater reduction in defrosting duration could be achieved. This further demonstrates
         that a better thermal comfort performance may be achieved when using a three-circuit
         outdoor coil. However, the circuit number in an outdoor coil is always limited by its
         physical dimensions. Also, when a larger number of circuits is used, or when the heat
         exchanger area of an outdoor coil is fixed and the circuit number increased, the effects
         of melted frost flowing downward should be further studied.
            On the other hand, further mathematical modeling studies on the heat and mass
         transfer mechanisms when the melted frost from the upper circuits flows over the
         frosted surface of the lower circuits in a vertical multicircuit outdoor coil have also
         been carried out, and the study results will be reported in the next chapter separately.
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82