Page 183 - Design for Six Sigma a Roadmap for Product Development
P. 183

156   Chapter Five



                                                      Y=f(x)
                            FRs  (CTQs)
               CAs             •              DPs            PVs
                •              •               •              •
                •              •               •              •
                •                              •              •
                                      Y=f(x)
                                   Physical mapping       Process mapping
           Figure 5.13 The design process mappings.



           second mapping from CTSs to the functional requirements (FRs). This
           mapping is very critical as it yields the definition of the high-level min-
           imum set of functional requirements needed to accomplish the design
           value from the customer perspective. Once the minimum set of FRs
           are defined, the physical mapping should start. This mapping involves
           the FR domain and the codomain design parameter (DP). It represents
           the structuring activity and can be represented mathematically by
           design matrices (mapping) or, graphically, by block diagrams. The col-
           lection of design matrices forms the conceptual structure.
             The process mapping is the last mapping and involves the DP
           domain and the process variables (PV) codomain. This mapping can be
           represented by matrices as well and provides the process structure
           needed to translate the DPs to PVs in manufacturing or production
           environments.
             The zigzagging process of axiomatic design is a conceptual modeling
           technique that reveals how the design is coupled in the FRs. In the
           physical mapping, the FRs are the array of responses denoted as the
           array y.* Coupling of the FRs is a design weakness that negatively
           affects controllability and adjustability of the design entity. Coupling
           can be defined as the degree of lack of independence between the FRs,
           propagates over the design mappings, and limits the potential for Six
           Sigma design. Uncoupled designs are not only desirable in terms of
           controllability, quality, and robustness standpoints but also have a
           potential for high probability of producibility, namely, reduced defect
           per opportunity (DPO).
             When a design matrix is square, where the number of FRs equals
           the number of DPs, and diagonal, the design is called independent or
           uncoupled. An uncoupled design is a one-to-one mapping.



             *Mathematical bolded notation implies an array or a matrix.
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188