Page 247 - Design for Six Sigma a Roadmap for Product Development
P. 247

Quality Function Deployment (QFD)  217


                                      B            E                   C
                A
                                                                    Customer
             Customer                            Rest of
                           +         QFD                            Perceived
              Needs                              DFSS
                            –                                        Result



                                             D


                                          Customer
                                          Satisfaction
                                           Gauge

           Figure 7.3 QFD position in the current design loop.
           phases and their components. Each phase will be discussed in detail
           later in this chapter.
             The position of QFD is best described by the block diagram in Fig. 7.3,
           modeled as a closed loop to reflect the ongoing design activities. The
           figure indicates the QFD iterative step-by-step process as represented by
           the loop of customer-QFD–physical solution entity. In this feedback loop,
           let A   customer needs, B   QFD analysis, C   desired designed entity
           (product/service/process), D   customer satisfaction gauge (e.g., surveys),
           E   other DFSS tools and concepts; then the gain  C/A is given by
           B/(1 BDE). Two general analysis activities occur in the loop on a contin-
           uous basis: the forward customer analysis activities of QFD (block B) and
           the backward customer analysis activities (block D). If the block product
                                      1
           BDE 		 1, then C/A   (DE) . This means that our analytical capabili-
           ties should cope with our ability to synthesize concepts (Suh 1990).
             QFD uses many techniques in an attempt to minimize and ease the
           task of handling large numbers of functional requirements that
           might be encountered. Applications in the range of 130 (engineering
           functions) 
 100 (customer features) were recorded (Hauser and
           Clausing 1988). One typical grouping technique that may be used
           initially in a QFD study is the affinity diagram, which is a hierarchi-
           cal grouping technique used to consolidate multiple unstructured
           ideas generated by the voice of the customer. It operates on the basis of
           intuitive similarities that may be detected from low-level standalone
           ideas (bottom) to arrangements of classes of ideas (up). This bundling
           of customer’s features is a critical step. It requires a cross-functional
           team that has multiple capabilities such as the ability to brainstorm,
           evaluate, and revolutionize existing ideas in pursuit of identifying
           logical (not necessarily optimum) groupings and hence, minimizing
           the overall list of needs into manageable classes.
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252