Page 251 - Design for Six Sigma a Roadmap for Product Development
P. 251

Quality Function Deployment (QFD)  221


           desirability index. This product, when summed over all the customer
           features in the WHATs array, provides a measure of the relative impor-
           tance of each CTS to the DFSS team and is used as a planning index
           to allocate resources and efforts, comparing the strength, importance,
           and interactions of these various relationships. This importance rating
           is called the technical importance rating.


           7.4.4 Importance ratings
           Importance ratings are a relative measure indicating the importance
           of each WHAT or HOW to the design. In QFD, there are two impor-
           tance ratings:
           ■ Customer desirability index. This is obtained from the voice of the
             customer activities such as surveys and clinics, and is usually rated on
             the scale from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important) as follows:


                    Importance
            Extremely Important   5.0
            Very Important       4.0
            Somewhat Important   3.0
            A Little Import      2.0
            Not Important        1.0

           ■ Technical importance ratings. These are calculated as follows:

             1. By convention, each symbol in the relationship matrix receives a
                value representing the strength in the (WHAT,HOW) cell.
             2. These values are then multiplied by the customer desirability
                index, resulting in a numerical value for symbol in the matrix.
             3. The technical importance rating for each HOW can then be found
                by adding together the values of all the relationship symbols in
                each column.
           The technical importance ratings have no physical interpretation, and
           their value lies in their ranking relative to one another. They are utilized
           to determine what HOWs are priority and should receive the most
           resource allocation. In doing so, the DFSS team should use the technical
           importance rating as a campus coupled with other factors such as dif-
           ficulty, innovation, cost, reliability, and timing and all other measures
           in their project charter.

           7.4.5 Planning matrix
           This task includes comparisons of competitive performance and identi-
           fication of a benchmark in the context of ability to meet specific customer
           needs. It is also used as a tool to set goals for improvement using a ratio
   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256