Page 282 - Design for Six Sigma a Roadmap for Product Development
P. 282

252   Chapter Eight


            The array of FRs:
                  y 1.1   charge chamber
                  y 1.2   discharge chamber at uniform rate
                  y 1.3   does not allow slip flow to pass from outlet to inlet
                  y 1.4   provides displacement charge based on external hydraulic signal
            The array of DPs:
                  x 1.1   expanding chamber
                  x 1.2   collapsing volumes
                  x 1.3   sealing device—geometry boundary between inlet and outlet
                  x 1.4   movable bore ring
                  x 1.5   bias spring
                  x 1.6   control pressure
                  x 1.7   rigid cover
                  x 1.8   rigid body

            The design mapping with (m   4, p   8) is given as  x 1.1


              y 1.1   A 11  0  A 13 A 14  0  0  A 17 A 18  x 1.2
                                                      x 1.3
                                                      x 1.4
              y 1.2   0  A 22 A 23  0  0  A 26 A 27 A 28 ] {}

              y 1.3   0   0  A 33  0  0  0  A 37 A 38  x 1.5
            { }[ 0        0  A 43 A 44 A 45 A 46 A 47 A 48  x 1.6
              y 1.4
                                                      x 1.7
                                                      x 1.8
           Figure 8.10 The design matrix of x 1   “displacement mechanism” (level 1.1).

           Figure 8.10 is mapping of x 1   “displacement mechanism.” We have
           four FRs (array y) with m, the number of FRs, equal to 4, and eight
           design parameters (array x) with p   8, a redundant design since p 	 m.
           Once the zigzagging process is completed, the decoupling phase starts
           in all design mappings in the respective hierarchy.


           8.5 Coupling Measures

           The design categories have twofold importance: (1) they provide a sort
           of design classification scheme and (2) they strengthen the need to
           assess the degree of coupling in a given design entity. Reinderle (1982)
           proposed the simultaneous use of reangularity R and semangularity S
           as coupling measures:
                                     p         2    p     p

                                                        2
               R                     
  A kj A kj      
  A kj 
  A kj
                                1
                                                              2
                    j   1, p   1    i   1          k   1  k   1         (8.6)
                   k   1   i, p
   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287