Page 390 - Design for Six Sigma a Roadmap for Product Development
P. 390

360   Chapter Ten


           alternatives, assess manufacturing cost, and make trade-offs between
           physical coupling (DPs consolidation) and increased manufacturing
           cost. The DFM approach provides experimental data for estimating
           cost of many processes. The DFSS team is encouraged to consult with
           the following studies where deemed appropriate: Dewhurst (1988) for
           injection molding, Dewhurst and Blum (1989) for die-cast parts,
           Zenger and Dewhurst (1988) for sheetmetal stamping, and Knight
           (1991) for powder metal parts.
             The DFMA approach usually benefits from poka-yoke (errorproofing)
           techniques, which may be applied when components are taking form
           and manufacturing and assembly issues are considered simultane-
           ously. Poka-yoke is a technique for avoiding human error at work. The
           Japanese manufacturing engineer Shigeo Shingo developed the tech-
           nique to achieve zero defects and came up with this term, which means
           “errorproofing.” A defect exists in either of two states: (1) it already has
           occurred, calling for defect detection, or (2) is about to occur, calling for
           defect prediction. Poka-yoke has three basic functions to use against
           defects: shutdown, control, and warning. The technique starts by ana-
           lyzing the process for potential problems, identifying parts by the char-
           acteristics of dimension, shape, and weight, detecting processes
           deviating from nominal procedures and norms.

             Example 10.1  In this exercise (Huang 1996) a motor-drive assembly must
             be designed to sense and control whether it is in position on two steel
             guiderails. The motor is fixed on a rigid base to enable the up-down move-
             ment over the rails and to support the motor system (Fig. 10.3). The motor
             and the measurement cylindrical sensor are wired to a power supply unit
             and control unit, respectively. The motor system is fully enclosed and has a
             removable cover for access to adjust position sensor when needed. The cur-
             rent design is given in Figs. 10.3 and 10.4.
               The motor system is secured to the base with two screws. The sensor is held
             by a setscrew. To provide suitable friction and to guard against wear, the base
             is provided with two bushes. The end cover is secured by two end-plate
             screws, fastened to two standoffs, and screwed into the base. The end plate is
             fitted with a plastic bush for connecting wire passage. A box-shaped cover
             slides over the whole assembly from below the bases. The cover is held in
             place by four cover screws, two into the base and two into the end cover. Is this
             a good assembly design?


             Solution  We need to take the following DFMA steps:
             1. Study the current (datum) design and identify all parts and subassem-
                blies. The proposed initial design is formed from 19 elements:
                a. Two purchased design subassemblies: the motor drive and the sensor.
                b. Eight other parts (end plate, cover, etc.)
                c. Nine screws
   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395