Page 37 - Digital Analysis of Remotely Sensed Imagery
P. 37

10    Cha pte r  O n e


                  245    233   247    274   344   306    293   304    325
                  269    240   251    260   332   263    229   259    324
                  305    268   230    234   259   273    245   251    258
                  305    258   310    259   276   351    372   279    285
                  331    218   454    386   557   822    616   347    263
                  544    270   383    851   820   674    442   305    246
                  666    380   253    431   342   291    397   384    252
                  390    319   254    246   256   337    332   267    361
                  246    253   258    255   271   440    375   238    321
                  239    252   260    295   329   358    362   516    515
                  445    377   241    352   492   552    441   525    604
                  536    490   299    350   473   610    453   288    513
                  447    487   349    274   420   592    511   315    426
                  317    307   281    308   512   521    542   319    428
                  258    258   258    244   365   357    457   307    368
                  314    295   311    277   237   262    289   321    268
                  297    262   280    286   285   276    289   295    338
                  294    427   378    297   274   291    289   295    287
                  280    272   274    279   298   289    306   315    305

               FIGURE 1.3  An image is composed of a two-dimensional array of pixel
               values. Down: row. Across: column.

               during sampling of the Earth’s surface. Thus, pixel size is synonymous
               with the ground sampling interval. Theoretically, the pixel size of a
               satellite image cannot be made finer once the image is scanned,
               though it is possible to reduce this size to a smaller dimension (e.g.,
               from 10 to 5 m) through resampling during image processing.
               However, the detail of the image cannot be improved by simply
               splitting a pixel into fractions. Similarly, through resampling the pixel
               size of an image can be reduced by amalgamating spatially adjoining
               pixels. As more adjoining pixels are merged, the image increasingly
               loses its detail level.
                   Pixels fall into two broad categories, pure pixels and mixed pixels, in
               terms of the composition of their corresponding covers on the ground.
               Pure pixels are defined as those that are scanned over a homogeneous
               ground cover. These pixels have a pure identity relating to a unique
               type of ground feature. By comparison, mixed pixels contain the
               electromagnetic radiation originating from at least two types of cover
               features on the ground. The formation and quantity of mixed pixels in
               an image are affected by the following three factors. (1) Spatial resolution
               or pixel size: Given the same scene on the ground, an image of a coarser
               spatial resolution contains more mixed pixels. (2) Homogeneity of
               the scene: A highly heterogeneous scene is conducive to formation of
               more mixed pixels (these pixels are usually located at the interface
               of differing ground covers). (3) Shape and orientation of these different
               cover parcels in relation to the direction of scanning: Highly irregulary
               shaped cover parcels tend to have more mixed pixels along their
               borders.
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42