Page 263 - Distillation theory
P. 263

P1: JPJ/FFX  P2: JMT/FFX  QC: FCH/FFX  T1: FCH
            0521820928c07  CB644-Petlyuk-v1                                                      June 11, 2004  20:18





                                7.3 Design Calculation of Two-Section Columns                     237

                                        x D
                                                  2
                                a) x F

                                        x B
                                                 x R f − 1
                                                   1
                                                     x  R f  1
                                           x  R f − 2 1
                                      1                           4
                                               x R  2
                                                f

                                             3
                                b)
                                  N
                                50
                                40
                                30        tot
                                20        str
                                10        rec
                                0                                       (L/V) r
                                 0.45   0.5    0.55   0.6   0.65    0.7

                                Figure 7.8. Section trajectories at quasisharp intermediate
                                split for the equimolar pentane(1)-hexane(2)-heptane(3)-
                                octane(4) mixture for L/V = 0.455 (R1) and L/V = 0.713 (R2),
                                x f −1 = x ∞  + 0.3	x sh  ,η D = η B = 0.99 (a); dependence of
                                      f −1
                                               f −1
                                trays number on the value of (L/V) r (b).
                                stationary point of the bundle located in face 2-3-4: this stationary point is located
                                in component-order region Reg 3124 , where component 1 absent in face 2-3-4 is not
                                                           ord
                                the lightest one. Therefore, the stationary point in face 2-3-4 is the stable node
                                 +(2)                 2
                                N s  but not the saddle S .               1,3
                                                      s
                                               2(α)                        R
                                  Saddle point S s  of the separatrix bundle Reg sep,s  is located at the line of its
                                                                          2,4
                                intersection with α 13 -surface (see also Fig. 5.28b). This generates in the separatrix
                                                    1   2(α)
                                bundle the separatrix S − S s  that breaks the whole bundle into two bundles
                                                    s
                                 1   2(α)   +(1)     1   2(α)   +(2)
                                S − S s  − N s  and S − S s  − N s  . The trajectory of the bottom section
                                 s                   s
                                should be located in the first of these bundles. This example makes it obvious that
                                at the validity of design calculation it is necessary to examine stationary points S 2
                                located not only in the boundary elements of the concentration simplex, but also
                                                                                                2(α)
                                in the α-manifolds (for point x B located on the edge 2-4 stationary points S s  lie
                                at different L/V on some line in the α 13 – surface).
                                  Other peculiarities of the separatrix bundle under consideration include the
                                                                                      2(α)   +(1)
                                S-shape course of the trajectories and a big deviation of line S s  − N s  from
                                linearity and, correspondingly, a big deviation of point x  ∞  from point x ∞  . This
                                                                                 f            f,lin
                                deviation leads to a decrease in the length of segment [x f ] as compared with that
                                             sh
                                of segment [x f ] . Therefore, in Fig. 7.10, that shows dependence N r , N s , and N tot
                                             lin
   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268