Page 194 - Electromagnetics
P. 194

Figure 3.23: System of conductors used to derive Thomson’s theorem.


                        so that

                                                                   	          2
                                         δW e = 	  ∇  ·∇(δ ) dV +      |∇(δ )| dV ;
                                                  V                2  V
                        Thomson’s theorem will be proved if we can show that

                                                       ∇  ·∇(δ ) dV = 0,                      (3.209)
                                                     V
                        because then we shall have
                                                        	          2
                                                  δW e =    |∇(δ )| dV ≥ 0.
                                                        2  V
                        To establish (3.209), we use Green’s first identity

                                                            2
                                                (∇u ·∇v + u∇ v) dV =   u∇v · dS
                                               V                      S
                        with u = δ  and v =  :

                                                 ∇  ·∇(δ ) dV =    δ  ∇  · dS.
                                                V                 S
                        Here S is composed of (1)the exterior surfaces S k (k = 1,..., n)of the n bodies, (2)
                        the surfaces S c of the “cuts” that are introduced in order to keep V a simply-connected
                        region (a condition for the validity of Green’s identity), and (3) the sphere S ∞ of very
                        large radius r.Thus
                                                 n


                                ∇  ·∇(δ ) dV =        δ  ∇  · dS +   δ  ∇  · dS +   δ  ∇  · dS.
                               V                k=1  S k           S c            S ∞
                        The first term on the right vanishes because δ  = 0 on each S k . The second term
                        vanishes because the contributions from opposite sides of each cut cancel (note that ˆ n
                        occurs in pairs that are oppositely directed). The third term vanishes because   ∼ 1/r,
                                 2
                                            2
                        ∇  ∼ 1/r , and dS ∼ r where r →∞ for points on S ∞ .


                        © 2001 by CRC Press LLC
   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199