Page 425 - Electromagnetics
P. 425

Since this gives the contribution to the field in V from the fields on the surface receding
                        to infinity, we expect that this term should be zero. If the medium has loss, then the
                        exponential term decays and drives the contribution to zero. For a lossless medium the
                        contributions are zero if
                                                                  ˜
                                                              lim rE(r,ω) < ∞,                  (6.9)
                                                             r→∞
                                                         ˜        ˜
                                               lim r ηˆ r × H(r,ω) + E(r,ω) = 0.               (6.10)
                                              r→∞
                        To accompany (6.8) we also have

                                                                  ˜
                                                             lim rH(r,ω) < ∞,                  (6.11)
                                                             r→∞
                                                      ˜           ˜
                                               lim r ηH(r,ω) − ˆ r × E(r,ω) = 0.               (6.12)
                                              r→∞
                        We refer to (6.9) and (6.11) as the finiteness conditions, and to (6.10) and (6.12) as the
                        Sommerfeld radiation condition, for the electromagnetic field. They show that far from
                        the sources the fields must behave as a wave TEM to the r-direction. We shall see in
                        § 6.2 that the waves are in fact spherical TEM waves.


                        6.1.3   Fields in the excluded region: the extinction theorem
                          The Stratton–Chu formula provides a solution for the field within the region V , external
                        to the excluded regions. An interesting consequence of this formula, and one that helps
                                                                                     ˜
                                                                                          ˜
                        us identify the equivalence principle, is that it gives the null result H = E = 0 when
                        evaluated at points within the excluded regions.
                          We can show this by considering two cases. In the first case we do not exclude the
                        particular region V m , but do exclude the remaining regions V n , n  = m. Then the electric
                        field everywhere outside the remaining excluded regions (including at points within V m )
                        is, by (6.7),

                                                           ˜ ρ
                                             
              i
                               ˜                ˜ i                    ˜ i
                               E(r,ω) =        −J ×∇ G +     ∇ G − jω ˜µJ G  dV +
                                                 m          c
                                         V +V m            ˜


                                                    ˜                              ˜
                                                                  ˜
                                      +        (ˆ n × E) ×∇ G + (ˆ n · E)∇ G − jω ˜µ(ˆ n × H)G dS −
                                        n =m  S n
                                                          ˜
                                             1


                                      −              (dl · H)∇ G,   r ∈ V + V m .
                                            jω˜  c
                                        n =m
                                                  na +  nb
                        In the second case we apply the Stratton–Chu formula only to V m , and exclude all other
                        regions. We incur a sign change on the surface and line integrals compared to the first
                        case because the normal is now directed oppositely. By (6.7) we have

                                                           ˜ ρ i
                                 ˜              ˜ i                   ˜ i
                                 E(r,ω) =     −J ×∇ G +     ∇ G − jω ˜µJ G  dV −
                                                m          c
                                          V m              ˜

                                                                ˜
                                                  ˜                              ˜
                                       −     (ˆ n × E) ×∇ G + (ˆ n · E)∇ G − jω ˜µ(ˆ n × H)G dS +
                                          S m
                                           1
                                                        ˜


                                       +           (dl · H)∇ G,    r ∈ V m .
                                          jω˜  c
                                                na +  nb
                        © 2001 by CRC Press LLC
   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430