Page 485 - Electromagnetics
P. 485

reader can verify that any dyadic can be decomposed into symmetric and antisymmetric
                        parts as

                                                      1     T     1     T
                                                  ¯ a =  ¯ a + ¯ a  +  ¯ a − ¯ a  .
                                                      2          2
                                                                              ¯
                          A simple example of a symmetric dyadic is the unit dyadic I defined by
                                                                   ˆ ˆ
                                                         ˆ ˆ
                                                              ˆ ˆ
                                                      ¯ I = i 1 i 1 + i 2 i 2 + i 3 i 3 .
                        This quantity often arises in the manipulation of dyadic equations, and satisfies
                                                             ¯
                                                          ¯
                                                       A · I = I · A = A
                                                     ¯
                        for any vector A. In matrix form I is the identity matrix:
                                                                 
                                                              100
                                                        ¯
                                                       [I] =   010   .
                                                              001
                          The components of a dyadic may be complex. We say that ¯ a is hermitian if
                                                                ∗
                                                         B · ¯ a = ¯ a · B                     (A.72)
                                                            T
                                                        ∗
                        holds for any B. This requires that ¯ a = ¯ a . Taking the transpose we can write
                                                             ∗ T
                                                        ¯ a = (¯ a ) = ¯ a †
                        where “†” stands for the conjugate-transpose operation. We say that ¯ a is anti-hermitian
                        if
                                                        B · ¯ a =−¯ a · B                      (A.73)
                                                                 ∗
                                                         T
                                                   ∗
                        for arbitrary B. In this case ¯ a =−¯ a . Any complex dyadic can be decomposed into
                        hermitian and anti-hermitian parts:
                                                           1    H  A
                                                       ¯ a =  ¯ a + ¯ a                        (A.74)
                                                           2
                        where
                                                  H
                                                                  A
                                                           †
                                                                          †
                                                 ¯ a = ¯ a + ¯ a ,  ¯ a = ¯ a − ¯ a .          (A.75)
                          A dyadic identity important in the study of material parameters is
                                                        ∗
                                                                 ∗
                                                            ∗
                                                                    †
                                                    B · ¯ a · B = B · ¯ a · B.                 (A.76)
                        We show this by decomposing ¯ a according to (A.74), giving


                                                       1       H ∗       A ∗

                                               ∗   ∗       ∗          ∗         ∗
                                           B · ¯ a · B =  B · ¯ a  + B · ¯ a  · B
                                                       2
                                               ∗
                                                    ∗
                        where we have used (B · ¯ a) = (B · ¯ a ). Applying (A.72) and (A.73) we obtain
                                                        ∗


                                                      1        ∗ ∗        ∗ ∗

                                              ∗   ∗       H∗          A∗         ∗
                                           B · ¯ a · B =  ¯ a  · B  − ¯ a  · B  · B
                                                      2
                                                       ∗  1     H        A
                                                   = B ·     ¯ a · B − ¯ a · B
                                                         2

                                                           1    H  A
                                                       ∗
                                                   = B ·     ¯ a − ¯ a  · B .
                                                           2
                                                       A
                                                  H
                        Since the term in brackets is ¯ a − ¯ a = 2¯ a by (A.75), the identity is proved.
                                                             †
                        © 2001 by CRC Press LLC
   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490