Page 214 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 214

196               Engineered  interfaces in jiber reinforced composites

                    Table 5.8
                    Summary of Mode I and Mode I1 interlaminar fracture toughness values for unidirectional carbon fiber-
                    828 mPDA epoxy matrix composites with different fiber surface treatmentsa
                    Interlaminar properties   AU-4 fiber   AS-4 fibcr   AS-4C fiber   mPDA epoxy
                    Mode I  interlaminar   Unable to   0.33  iz 0.02   0.39 =k  0.03   0.13
                    fracture toughness, GI, (kJ/m2)   determine
                    Mode I1 interlaminar fracture   0.40 It 0.08   1.04  f 0.17   1.15  f 0.13   -
                    toughness, GII, (kJ/rnZ)
                    “After Drzal and Madhukar (1993)



                    interfacial adhesion is expected in view  of  the analogy in loading geometry of the
                    two test methods. Enhancement of the interfacial bond strength changes the failure
                    mode  from  “interface-dominated’’  to  “matrix-dominated”,  which  is  mainly
                    responsible for the increase in mode I1 interlaminar fracture toughness. The above
                    finding suggests that when the interfacc bond strength approaches the matrix shear
                    strength, further increase in interface bonding may not impart additional improve-
                    ment in mode I1 interlaminar fracture toughness.


                    5.4.  Polymeric fibers

                    5.4.1. Aramid,fihers

                    5.4.1 .I.  Structure and properties  of aramid fibers
                      The  commercial  aramid  fibers  are  currently  produced  by  several  companies,
                    including  du  Pont  (Kevlar), AKZO  (Twaron)  and Tenjin  (Technora). Table 5.9
                    (Morgan and Allred,  1993) presents the chemical structures of aromatic polyamides
                    that are developed  for  commercial  fiber production.  Among  these,  Kevlar  fibers
                    were the first developed and are now most popular. Thus, discussion in the following
                    will be mainly concerned with this fiber type, unless otherwise specified. The Kevlar
                    fibers are produced from liquid crystal dopes through a dry-jet wet-spinning process.
                    It is a polycondensation product of terephthaoyl chloride and p-phenylene diamine.
                    The molecules form a planar array with interchain hydrogen bonding as shown in
                    Fig.  5.19(a). The stacking sheets form a crystalline array whose bonding is rather
                    weak.  Electron microscopy  and diffraction  studies  show (Dobb et al.,  1977) that
                    Kevlar fibers consist of radially  arranged  and axially pleated crystalline supramo-
                    lecular sheets, as schematically presented in  Fig. 5.19(b).
                      Kevlar fibers are available in four forms: Kevlar,  Kevlar 29,  Kevlar 49 and the
                    recently developed Kevlar  149. Kevlar is designed specifically for reinforcements of
                    elastomers  (e.g.  tires  and  belts),  while  Kevlar  29  is  used  primarily  for  tensile
                    members such as ropes, cables, webbings and ballistic cloth. Kevlar 49 and 149 are
                    designed for reinforcement  of  high performance PMCs.  Kevlar  149 offers a 40%
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219