Page 286 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 286

Chapter 6. Interface mechanics  and fracture  toughness theories   267

               KI = nnJa is the stress intensity factor, and F, the material constant, both of which
               depend  on the degree of anisotropy  of the composite controlled by  the composite
               elastic moduli  in  the  longitudinal  and transverse  directions,  EL and ET, in-plane
               Poisson   ratio,   VLT,  and  GLT.  For  a  perfectly  isotropic  material,
               F  M n/8( 1 + vLT)  FZ  0.3. Also, the material parameters, 6, and 42, are given by:



                                                                                 (6.36)




               The predictions based on Eq. (6.35) are found to be consistent with the results from
               finite  element  analysis,  Fig.  6.22,  for  a  carbon  fiber-epoxy  matrix  orthotropic
               laminate.
                 Based on the above analysis, Newaz (1985, 1986) measured the interfacial fracture
               toughness using  SEN specimens: J, = 3.7  and 6.6  kJ/m2 for unidirectional  glass-
               polyester and glass-epoxy  composites, respectively. Clearly, these values are thought
               to be over one order of magnitude greater than those determined from single fiber
               pull-out tests for similar composite systems (Chua and Piggott, 1985), even though
               the shear yield stresses are similar in the two different experiments. It appears that
               the  Jc  values  obtained  using  the  SEN  geometry  represent  the  total  fracture






                                f
                                 m
                                 c
                                 (u
                                d
                                Y
                                 U
                                 E
                                 u
                                %
                                r
                                t
                                 m
                                 c
                                 (u
                                d
                                .-
                                c
                                A
                                n
                                v)
                                        Displacement / half specimen
                                                         length

                Fig. 6.22. Comparisons of the longitudinal splitting length, L,,  between analysis and finite element method
                         for graphite fiber-epoxy matrix orthotropic laminates. After Tirosh (1973).
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291