Page 33 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 33

16                Engineered interfaces in jiber reinforced composites

                    Table 2.3
                    Classification of fiber-metal  matrix composite systemsa

                    Class I                 Class I1               Class I11
                    w-cu                    W-Cu(Cr) eutectics     W-Cu(Ti)
                    A1203-CU                W-Nb                   C-AI  ( > 700 "C)
                    A1203-Ag                C-Ni                   AI2Q3-Ti
                    BN coated B             W-Ni                   &Ti
                    B-Mg                                           Sic-Ti
                    B-AI                                           Si02-AI
                    Stainless steel-A1
                    Sic-AI
                    aAfter Metcalfe (1974)


                    originating from  the  oxide present  on the fiber surface,  due to the  limited fiber-
                    matrix  reaction,  e.g.,  between  alumina whisker  and  zirconia  matrix  (Becher and
                    Tiegs, 1987), or resulting from the decomposition of the metastable Sic fibers in Sic
                    matrix (Naslain, 1993). The reaction compound thereby formed normally has a low
                    fracture energy and is soft compared to the fiber or matrix. It acts as a compliant
                    layer  for  the  relaxation  of  residual  thermal  stresses  and  promotes  longitudinal
                    splitting along the fiber length.

                    2.2.6.  Mechanical  bonding
                      Mechanical  bonds  involve  solely  mechanical  interlocking  at  the  fiber  surface.
                    Mechanical anchoring promoted by surface oxidation treatments, which produce a
                    large number  of  pits,  corrugations  and large  surface area  of  the carbon fiber, is
                    known  to be a significant mechanism  of  bonding in carbon fiber-polymer  matrix
                    composites (see Chapter 5). The strength of  this type of interface is unlikely to be
                    very high in transverse tension unless there are a large number of re-entrant angles
                    on  the  fiber  surface,  but  the  strength  in  longitudinal  shear  may  be  significant
                    depending on the degree of roughness.
                      In  addition  to the  simple geometrical  aspects of mechanical bonding, there are
                    many  different types of internal  stresses present  in  composite materials  that arise
                    from  shrinkage  of  the  matrix  material  and  the  differential  thermal  expansion
                    between fiber and matrix  upon cooling  from  the processing temperature.  Among
                    these  stresses,  the  residual  clamping  stress  acting  normal  to  the  fiber  direction
                    renders a synergistic benefit on top of the mechanical  anchoring discussed above.
                    These mechanisms provide major bonding at the interface of many CMCs and play
                    a decisive role in controlling their fracture resistance and R-curve behavior. Further
                    details of these residual stresses are discussed in Chapter 7.
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38