Page 34 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 34

Chapter 2.  Characterization of interfaces      17

                2.3.  Physico-chemical  characterization of interfaces

                2.3.1.  Introduction

                  Composite  interfaces  exist  in  a  variety  of  forms  of  differing  materials.  A
                convenient  way  to  characterize  composite  interfaces  embedded  within  the  bulk
                material  is  to  analyze  the  surfaces  of  the  composite constituents  before  they  are
                combined together, or the surfaces created by fracture. Surface layers represent only
                a small portion of the total volume of bulk material. The structure and composition
                of the local surface often differ from the bulk material, yet they can provide critical
                information  in  predicting  the  overall  properties  and  performance.  The  basic
                unknown  parameters  in  physico-chemical  surface  analysis  are  the  chemical
                composition,  depth,  purity  and  the  distribution  of  specific constituents  and  their
                atomic/microscopic structures, which constitute the interfaces. Many factors such as
                process variables, contaminants, surface treatments and exposure to environmental
                conditions must be considered in the analysis.
                  When  a  solid  surface is irradiated  with  a  beam  of  photons,  electrons or ions,
                species are generated  in  various  combinations.  An  analytical  method  for  surface
                characterization consists of using a particular  type of  probe beam and detecting a
                particular type of generated species. In spectroscopy, the intensity or efficiency of the
                phenomenon  of  species generation  is  studied  as a  function  of  the  energy  of  the
                species generated  at a constant  probe beam  energy, or vice versa.  Most  spectro-
                scopic techniques are capable of analyzing surface composition, and some also allow
                an estimation of  the chemical state of  the atoms.  However, it may  be  difficult to
                isolate the contributions of each surface layer of the material being probed to these
                properties. Since most surface analysis techniques probe only the top dozen atomic
                layers,  it  is  important  not  to  contaminate  this  region.  For  this  reason  and
                particularly  to  reduce  gas  adsorption,  a  vacuum  always  has  to  be  used  in
                conjunction with these techniques. The emergence of ultrahigh vacuum systems of
                less than loT6 Pa (or 7.5 x   Torr), due to rapid technological advances in recent
                years,  has  accelerated  the  development  of  sophisticated  techniques  utilizing
                electrons,  atoms  and  ions.  Amongst  the  currently  available  characterization
                techniques,  the  most  useful  ones  for composite interfaces  are:  infrared  (IR) and
                Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, laser Raman spectroscopy, X-ray
                photoelectron  spectroscopy  (XPS), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), secondary
                ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS), ion scattering spectroscopy (ISS), solid state nuclear
                magnetic  resonance  (NMR) spectroscopy,  wide-angle X-ray  scattering  (WAXS),
                small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and the measurement of the contact angle. A
                selected list of  these techniques  is presented  in Table 2.4 along with  their  atomic
                processes and the information they provide. Each technique has its own complexity,
                definite  applications  and  limitations.  Often  the  information  sought  cannot  be
                provided  by  a single technique.  This has resulted in the design of equipment that
                utilizes two  or more  techniques  and  obtains different sets of  data from  the  same
                surface of the sample (e.g. ISSjSIMS two-in-one and XPS/AES/SIMS three-in-one
                equipment). Adamson (1982), Lee (1989), Castle and Watts (1988) and Ishida (1994)
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39