Page 147 - Essentials of physical chemistry
P. 147

Gibbs’ Free Energy and Equilibria                                           109

            volume is approximately (373.15=273.15) (22,414 mL=mol) ¼ 30620 mL=mol using Charles’ law.
            Thus, we arrive at what is known as the Clapeyron equation, which can be used as is to study
            transitions in fusion of minerals but


                                        dP     DH vap    DH vap
                                        dT  ¼  T bp (DV vap )  ffi  T bp V vap

            is not quite what we need here for liquids. We pause here to note that B. P. E. Clapeyron (1799–
            1864) was a French engineer who made several contributions to thermodynamics and was actually
            the person who plotted the Carnot cycle as a PV diagram shown in a previous chapter. Interestingly,
            Carnot himself actually used the concept of ‘‘caloric’’ in his derivation but Clapeyron put the Carnot
            cycle into the form we have shown it in this text.
              The Clapeyron equation was extended to a more usable form by a German physicist R. G.
                                           dP
            Clausius (1822–1888) by splitting the  differential and integrating the new form using the ideal
                                           dT
                                                                                dP   DH vap
            gas law for the vapor at low pressure (a very good approximation) to obtain  ¼ 	 ,
                                                                                dT   T  RT
                                                                                        P

                                    dP   d ln P                               DH vap dT
            which can be rearranged to  P  ¼   ¼  DH vap  and then further to d ln P ¼   ¼
                                   dT     dT     RT 2                           R    T 2

              DH vap  1         1         1       2
                   d     since d   ¼ d(T  ) ¼ T    dT (a clever step indeed!).
               R      T         T

              Graphically, this leads to a plot similar to the case of the temperature dependent equilibrium
            constant shown above in the section on equilibrium. We see that we can plot a logarithm of the
            pressure against reciprocal Kelvin temperature and expect to find a straight line with a negative
            slope.
                                    ð                   ð
                                     P 2                 T 2
                                                  P 2      DH vap dT      DH vap 1   1
              This can be integrated as  d ln P ¼ ln  ¼               ¼                ,so
                                                  P 1        R    T 2       R   T 2  T 1
                                     P 1                 T 1
            the final working equation becomes the very useful Clausius–Clapeyron equation

                                          P 2    DH vap 1    1
                                       ln     ¼                :
                                          P 1      R    T 2  T 1
            Note this so-called Clausius–Clapeyron equation has five variables, so that a number of possible
            problems can be formulated for quiz questions and in a practical sense it is a very useful equation to
            find DH vap from P, T data or a boiling point if one knows DH vap .
              In Table 6.1, we see values of temperature at which the vapor pressure is at certain values.
            The final values at 100 kPa are not quite the normal boiling points because 1 atm ¼ 101.325 kPa.
            This table shows the modern way to represent these types of data, which reveals the vapor
            pressures of solids at low temperature, but often only provides two data points for P, T in
            the range of room temperature. Further, the use of only two points can only yield a perfect line
            when one plots the ln (P)versus(1=T). In order to show that the approximations made
            in deriving the Clausius–Clapeyron equation are good but not perfect, we also present in
            Figure 6.3, the older style data for the vapor pressure of liquid water (H 2 O) in mmHg and
            1 atm boiling point (see Table 6.2 [2])



                                           DH vap   1       DH vap    1
                                                                           ,
                           ln(P) ¼ ln(760)               þ
                                             R     T(K)       R     373:15
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152