Page 234 - Essentials of physical chemistry
P. 234

196                                                  Essentials of Physical Chemistry

            So we see that the K a x-ray emission of a Cu target can be calculated from the simple Bohr
            model but there is an error of about 6.2% compared to the experimental value of 1.541 Å; not
            exactly the six figure accuracy of the Rydberg value but close. Note, we have reversed the sign of
            the energy difference for an emission. The answer is sufficiently close to the experimental value
            that we are confident that our simple model has captured the main principle of the phenomenon.
            For further use later, let us ask what the effective nuclear charge is that would produce the correct
            wavelength:

                                    s ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
                                             12, 398 eV A ˚
                                                              ¼ 28:0791,
                               Z eff ffi
                                      (1:541 A ˚ )(0:75)(13:6057 eV)
            not the bare nuclear charge of 29.
              That is quite revealing and suggests that the n ¼ 1 shell is not completely empty. Using modern
            information about electron spin and the idea that orbitals can contain two electrons with opposite
            spin, it appears that there is still one electron in the n ¼ 1 orbital and only one is missing. The Bohr
            theory postulates that the orbital occupancy should be 2, 8, 8, 18, . . . with no reason given except
            that the periodic chart implies that occupancy, so the n ¼ 1 orbital should have two electrons and the
            K a data implies there is still one electron in the n ¼ 1 orbital.
              Today, most computer monitors and TV screens are some variant of a flat screen but not so long
            ago all TV screens and computer monitors were a picture tube in which a beam of electrons moved
            across the screen and excited phosphors on the inside of an evacuated ‘‘cathode ray tube.’’ That
            meant that you were facing an electron beam hitting the inside of a glass tube with energy of 20,000 V
            or so. What about K a x-rays from cathode ray screens? While the heaviest (highest Z) element in
            glass (SiO x ) would be Si (Z ¼ 14), the early green phosphors were a form of ZnO, so Zn was present
            (Z ¼ 30). Later, color TV tubes had lanthanide salts for various colors such as Eu 2 O 3 for the red
            color and so some Eu was present (Z ¼ 63). While the impact of the electron beam with Si atoms
            produced only ‘‘soft x-rays,’’ the heavier elements could produce x-rays with shorter wavelengths
            capable of breaking bonds in biological compounds. Thus, there was a safety issue with cathode ray
            tubes, especially for young developing children sitting close to the picture tube. Now, flat screen
            picture screens are not only more convenient but they also have eliminated an x-ray hazard that
            accompanied the use of cathode ray tubes.
              This author is old enough to have purchased new shoes at a time when department stores had
            ‘‘fluoroscopes,’’ which were real-time x-ray machines with inlets for your feet, and you could ‘‘show
            your mother’’ on a small TV-like screen that the shoes were big enough by wiggling your toes to
            show the space inside the new shoes. It is now known that high exposure to x-rays can cause
            sterility, so by now those old fluoroscopes are long gone. Fortunately, shoes tend to last a year or
            more so children’s exposure to x-rays was infrequent. Modern radiology technicians work behind a
            lead–glass wall and wear a film badge to monitor the extent of exposure on any given day.


            FORENSIC=ANALYTICAL USE OF AUGER X-RAYS

            One of the most interesting recent forensic developments is alloy analysis applied to bullets and
            metal shell casings. It has been found that with the sensitivity of modern instrumentation it is
            possible to analyze the alloys in forensic samples to match bullets to a particular box of cartridges
            due to slight variations in the alloy composition. A variety of techniques are available for alloy
            analysis such as various forms of optical emission spectra and mass spectroscopy but to continue
            our survey of applications of the Bohr equation, we want to discuss XRF [5]. The overall
            Auger process of aiming a beam of high energy electrons to knock inner electrons out of atoms
            produces scattered ‘‘Auger electrons’’ as well as x-ray emission due to outer electrons ‘‘falling’’ into
   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239