Page 287 - Essentials of physical chemistry
P. 287

The Schrödinger Wave Equation                                               249

            Theorem 3 A single set of eigenfunctions can exist for two different Hermitian operators if
                      the operators commute.

            Proof:  Assume there really are two operators, A and B, which have the same eigenfunction c so
            that Ac ¼ ac and Bc ¼ bc and that [A, B] ¼ 0. Again we set up the integral <cj[A, B]jc>.
                  ð          ð             ð                           ð
              0 ¼ c*(0)cdt ¼ c*[A, B]cdt ¼ c*(AB   BA)cdt ¼ (a*b*   ba) c*cdt ¼ 0, Q.E.D.

            This is an ‘‘existence’’ theorem, it means that there can be such a c or {c n } but even if we show the
            two operators commute it does not help find the set {c n }. However, the most important result of this
            theorem is that if two operators commute (not all do!) then we can ‘‘know’’ their eigenvalues or
            expectation values simultaneously. For two operators that do not commute we may be able to find
            the observable for one, while the other is not completely defined or vice versa. We can mention
            that the angular momentum operators (Lx, Ly, Lz) do not commute and a given set of eigenfunctions
            for the Lz operator may not give a clear interpretation of the eigenvalues for (Lx, Ly) using the
            eigenfunctions of Lz. We delay further discussion of this problem until the chapter on the H atom.
            The main use of this third theorem is to use the eigenfunctions of some particular operator, which
            commutes with the operator we are interested in to evaluate the expectation value in the known set
            of eigenfunctions. We will see that there are some blind alleys in quantum mechanics and we often
            have to use any trick we can think of to evaluate what we want to know, even if it is a roundabout
            approach and for those cases this third theorem can be useful.


            SUMMARY

            In this chapter we explored the question of how to use the De Broglie matter waves to describe
            molecular phenomena.

              1. The (time-independent) Schrödinger wave equation Hc ¼ Ec was derived from the second
                                                                     h    h
                                                                            into the second
                                                                     mv   p
                 derivative of an arbitrary wave function by incorporating l ¼  ¼
                 derivative expression of the wave function. The characteristics of an eigenvalue equation
                 were noted.
              2. It was noted that there is a total energy operator, H, called the Hamiltonian operator, which
                 can be set up by writing the kinetic energy operator in terms of momentum and the
                 potential energy without change except to regard it as a multiplicative operator. The key
                 to converting classical physics formulas into quantum mechanical operators is merely to

                            h d                                                       h
                                                                                  h     .
                 use p op ¼     where q is the coordinate corresponding to the momentum and   ¼
                          i dq                                                       2p
                 Then all one has to do is to solve the differential equation Hc ¼ Ec to find the wave
                 function c and the energy E. In principle, the wave function c contains all the available
                 information about a given system and c*c can be interpreted as a probability. Physical
                 quantities are described by ‘‘operators’’ as calculus functions, which can be applied to the
                 wave function to obtain the quantized values of physical observables.
              3. The problem of noninteracting particles trapped in a one-dimensional ‘‘box’’ with infinitely
                                                                    r ffiffiffi
                                                        2 2
                                                       n h            2     npx
                                                                n
                 high walls was solved to find the results E n ¼  2  and c ¼  sin  . The n ¼ 0
                                                       8mL            L     L
                 level is a trivial solution for ‘‘no particle’’ because sin(0) ¼ 0 and the energy levels are non-
                 degenerate with quadratically increasing spacing in n. However, the actual spacing
                 between the levels can be quite small as for the quantized translational energy of a gas
                 molecule.
   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292