Page 561 - Fair, Geyer, and Okun's Water and wastewater engineering : water supply and wastewater removal
P. 561

JWCL344_ch14_500-554.qxd  8/7/10  8:56 PM  Page 519







                                                                               14.8 Design Criteria of Sanitary Sewers  519
                                         conductor until as many as 10 units of flow have accumulated, whereas no lateral carries
                                         more than 3 units in Scheme b. Moreover, Scheme b exceeds 10 units in two sections for
                                         which the required capacities in Scheme a are still only 6 and 8 units, respectively.

                    14.8  DESIGN CRITERIA OF SANITARY SEWERS

                                         Systems of sanitary sewers receive the waterborne wastes from households, mercantile and
                                         industrial establishments, and public buildings and institutions. In addition, groundwater
                                         enters by infiltration from the soil and, too often, illicit property drain connections and
                                         leaking manhole covers increase the flow. Accordingly, their requisite capacity is deter-
                                         mined by the tributary domestic and institutional population, commercial water use, indus-
                                         trial activity, height of groundwater table, tightness of construction, and enforcement of
                                         rainwater separation.
                                             It is generally convenient to arrive at unit values of domestic flows on the basis of pop-
                                         ulation density and area served; but it would also be possible to develop figures for the
                                         number of people per front foot in districts of varying occupancy and make sewer length
                                         rather than area served the criterion of capacity design. Length (sometimes coupled with
                                         diameter) of sewer, indeed, offers a perhaps more rational basis for the estimation of
                                         groundwater infiltration. Unit values for flows from commercial districts are generally ex-
                                         pressed in terms of the area served. The quantities of wastewaters produced by industrial
                                         operations are more logically evaluated in terms of the units of daily production, for exam-
                                                                                                          3
                                         ple, gallons per barrel of beer, 100 cases of canned goods, 1,000 bushels (35.24 m ) of grain
                                         mashed, 100 lb (45.36 kg) of live weight of animals slaughtered, or 1,000 lb (453.6 kg) of
                                         raw milk processed.
                                             Peak domestic and commercial flows originate at about the same hour of the day but
                                         travel varying distances before they reach a given point in the system. Hence a reduction
                                         in, or damping of, the peak of the cumulative flows must generally be assumed. In a fash-
                                         ion similar to the reduction in flood flows with time of concentration (as represented by the
                                         size and shape of drainage area), the lowering of peak flows in sanitary sewers is conve-
                                         niently related to the volume of flow or to the number of people served, and unit values of
                                         design are generally not accumulated in direct proportion to the rate of discharge or to the
                                         tributary population.
                                             The design of conventional gravity sewers is based on the following design criteria:

                                             1. Long-term serviceability. The design of long-lived sewer infrastructure should
                                                consider serviceability factors, such as ease of installation, design period, useful
                                                life of the conduit, resistance to infiltration and corrosion, and maintenance re-
                                                quirements. The design period should be based on the ultimate tributary population
                                                and usually ranges from 25 to 50 years.
                                             2. Design flow. Sanitary sewers are designed to carry peak residential, commercial,
                                                institutional, and industrial flows, as well as infiltration and inflow. Gravity sewers
                                                are designed to flow full at the design peak flow. Design flows are based on various
                                                types of developments. Table 14.1 provides a list of design flows for various devel-
                                                opment types.
                                             3. Minimum pipe size. A minimum pipe size is dictated in gravity sewer design to re-
                                                duce the possibility of clogging. The minimum pipe diameter recommended by the
                                                Ten-States Standards is 8 in. (200 mm). Though the Ten-States Standards have
                                                only been adopted by 10 specific states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan,
                                                Minnesota, Missouri, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) and the
                                                Province of Ontario, they often provide the basis for other states’ standards.
   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566