Page 177 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 177

PIPES CONVEYING FLUID: LINEAR  DYNAMICS I              159

                A typical Argand diagram is given by Chen (1971a) for ,9 = 0.6, K  = 100. In this case
              the  system loses stability by  divergence at u N 4.7, is  restabilized at u 2: 7.2, and then
              loses stability by  single-mode flutter at u N 8.3 - all in the first mode, but at u 2:  17.7
              flutter also occurs in  the second mode. Thus, this system shares the characteristics of  a
              cantilevered and a clamped-pinned  pipe conveying fluid, with those of the latter being
              dominant. For smaller values of  K  (e.g. K  = 10) the system behaves as a cantilever, and
              the only possible form of  instability is flutter.
                Figure 3.62 is the stability diagram in terms of the spring stiffness parameter K. Several
              interesting observations may be made: (i) there is a critical value of  K, K,  = 34.81, below
              which only flutter is possible; (ii) for sufficiently high K, there is more than one divergence
              region, although the higher ones are of  limited physical significance; (iii) for sufficiently
              high K (say K  > 200), the values of ucf (critical flutter velocities) become significantly less
              dependent on ,9 than is the case for low  K  (say K  < 30), as if  the system tries to behave
              like a conservative one, but  still loses stability by  flutter: e.g. for ,B  = 0.4, 0.5 and  0.6,
              and following the second S-shaped curve in the ucf versus ,9 curve (see Figure 3.30) for
              ,B  = 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9; (iv) the three curves shown for B = 0.9 (two of  which are dashed)
              correspond to loss, recovery and  second loss of  stability associated with  the equivalent
              of  the third of  the S-shaped curves (Figure 3.30).
                Another interesting result  is  shown in  Figure 3.63. It  is  seen that  the  first S-shaped
              curve in the stability diagram marks a point of transition for the effect of K  on ucf. Thus,
              for ,9  < 0.3 approximately, K  stabilizes the system vis-&vis  K  = 0; for ,B  > 0.3, however,






                                16


                                14











                                 8


                                 6


                                 4
                                  0     0.2     0.4   0.6    0.8    I .0
                                                      P

              Figure 3.63  The dependence of  ucf on #J  for the system of  Figure 3.61(a) with various values of
                      K: -,   K  = 0; -. -. -, K  = 10; - - -, K  = 50; ---,  K  = 100 (Chen 1971a).
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182