Page 178 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 178

160               SLENDER STRUCTURES AND AXIAL FLOW

                   K  destabilizes the system. This is the first of  many unusual occurrences associated with
                   these S-shaped curves, as we shall see.
                     Experimental  verification of  some  of  the  foregoing  is  provided  by  Sugiyama et al.
                   (1985a), whose work is described next. Figure 3.64 shows the theoretical and experimental
                   critical  flow velocities for  three  pipes  (nominally with  ,9  = 0.25,  0.50 and  0.75)  with
                   varying K. It is seen that agreement is reasonably good, in particular with regard to the
                   critical  value  of  K  at  which  transition  from  divergence to  flutter occurs.  It  should be
                   noted that, when comparing flutter velocities, the reader should consider only the curves
                   for a = 0.02, which corresponds to the average measured damping, whereas a =
                   represents some arbitrary minimal damping.



                                                               Exp.
                                                            P   A   *
                                      15  -                 Flu.  Diver.  /3   -
                                                             d    0  0.249
                                                             0    D  0.505
                                        ---.   -.            0    13  0.780
                                                  \.




                                   U















                                        1        10       1 O2     1 o3     I o4
                                                          K
                    Figure 3.64  Comparison between theoretical stability boundaries (lines) and experimental points
                    for flutter (circles) and divergence (squares) of a cantilevered pipe with an additional spring support
                    at & = 1, as the spring stiffness K  is varied for the three values of B shown: -.-, a!  = 0.001; -,
                    a!  = 0.02; the theoretical curves are for B = 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75, whereas the expenmental values
                                   of B are as given in the legend (Sugiyama et al. 1985a).

                      Sugiyama et al.  (1985a) examine  the  effect  of  an  additional  spring  support  at  any
                    location along the cantilever, as shown in Figure 3.61(b), both theoretically and experi-
                    mentally. In this case the dimensionless equation of  motion is modified by the addition
                    of  the  term ~$(t - e$), where  6  is  the Dirac delta  function and ts = Z/L. Hence, the
                    method of  Section 3.3.6(b)  may be utilized, with the cantilever beam eigenfunctions as
                    comparison functions. It is found that as many as 14 such functions may be necessary to
                    achieve convergence to three  significant figures when .$  = 1, but that it is faster when
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183