Page 225 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 225

PIPES CONVEYING FLUID: LINEAR DYNAMICS I1              207




































             Figure 4.5  Argand  diagram  of  the  complex  eigenfrequencies  of  a  conical-conical cantilever
             conveying fluid and immersed in quiescent water, with and without dissipation in the pipe material
             taken into account (t= 22. S= 0.5, Be=  0.03, B, = 0.016, y=  16.47, y, = -0.08.  ye = 1.7, c,, = 0):
                  -
             ~  _ . pd = ud = 0 (undamped); -,   p,,  = 0.20,  ud  = 0.04 (damped) (Hannoyer & Pai'doussis
                                               1979a).

             the  reduced  flexural  rigidity  of  conical-conical  pipes  and  the  diminished  gravity  effect
             (p > pe in  the  case presented).  Second, there  are two flutter  instabilities  close  to  each
             other  (in  terms  of  ul). Comparing the  undamped  and  damped  systems,  there  is  little
             evident similarity in the root loci. The differences are more apparent than real, however.
             Although  different  modes become  unstable  in  the  two cases, the  critical flow velocities
             are not  too different.  It  is recalled  that  this being  a nonconservative  system.  dissipation
             can actually destabilize it.
               Figure 4.6(a) shows that, for tubular cantilevers of constant cone angle Be (and similarly
             for PI), varying E  by cutting pieces off the free end entails variations in Be (and similarly
             in  B,) - see  equations (4.24). Figure 4.6(b)  shows  the  effect  of  the  slenderness  ratio
             E  = L/D,(O)  on the critical flow  velocity  u,,  for a conical-conical  pipe  with constant  j3,
             and De. (It is  noted  that  as  6  changes,  the  corresponding  ae and  a, also change.)  It  is
             seen that with  increasing  slenderness the system loses stability at a lower flow velocity.
             This contrasts  with  the  case of  uniform  pipes  where  u,,  is almost  independent  of  e. Of
             course, the more  slender the system, the lower is the diinensional  critical flow velocity,
             in  any case (vide definition of  u,: since u, cx U,(O)L, as L  increases,  U,(O) decreases for
             a constant  u,); but  in conical  systems this effect  is greatly  amplified. Finally,  the effect
             of  the surrounding fluid is seen to be the same as for cylindrical-conical  pipes.
   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230