Page 348 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 348

328               SLENDER STRUCTURES AND AXIAL FLOW

                    5.7  CANTILEVERED PIPES
                    A rapid scan of publication dates will convince the reader that most of  the activity on
                    the dynamics of pipes conveying fluid has in recent years concentrated on the nonlinear
                    dynamics of continuous cantilevered pipes, to be discussed here, or articulated cantilevers,
                    covered in Section 5.6; this is more striking if one includes the work on chaotic dynamics,
                    presented in Section 5.8. The reason is that these systems display as varied and fascinating
                    nonlinear dynamical behaviour as the cornucopia in the linear dynamics domain already
                    discussed in Chapters 3 and 4.
                      In  keeping  with  the rest  of  this chapter, most  important findings are discussed to  a
                    greater  or lesser  extent,  but  the  mathematical methods and  analytical details  are  only
                    skimmed; only in one case, in Section 5.7.3, are they presented in fair detail.
                      As for articulated cantilevers, the character of the Hopf bifurcations leading to flutter is
                    a question of  considerable interest. For 2-D motions, this defines whether the bifurcation
                    is sub- or supercritical, as discussed in Section 5.7.1. For 3-D motions, this additionally
                    decides whether the flutter is planar or three-dimensional, as discussed in Section 5.7.2.
                    Again as for articulated cantilevers, it is of interest to examine the dynamics near different
                    types of double degeneracy conditions; this is done in Section 5.7.3.



                    5.7.1  2-D limit-cycle motions
                    Planar  limit-cycle  motions  of  a  vertical  cantilever  in  the  vicinity  of  the  critical  flow
                    velocity where the Hopf bifurcation arises were studied by Rousselet & Herrmann (1981).
                    A constant-pressure tank is assumed to feed the flow into  the pipe  [see Figure 5.2(a)],
                    while the flow velocity is pipe-deformation dependent, as discussed in Section 5.6.2 for the
                    articulated counterpart of this system. Hence, there are two coupled governing equations,
                    which are solved iteratively, in a manner similar to that described in Section 5.6.2: (i) the
                    homogeneous, linear solution to the equation of motions is obtained first; (ii) the solution
                    is  substituted into the  ‘flow equation’ which  yields  Au  and  AM,  the  flow velocity  and
                    acceleration due to pipe deforniation; (iii) the homogeneous solution together with  Au
                    and AU  are substituted into the full nonlinear equation of motion, which is solved by the
                    Krylov -Bogoliubov  averaging method, to first order, yielding the averaged amplitude, 2,
                    and  the  corresponding phase.  Of  course, at the  very threshold of  the Hopf  bifurcation
                    there is zero damping. A small amount of positive or negative external viscous damping,
                                 as
                                    a
                         is
                            added
                    h~~, control parameter, used to achieve purely real eigenfrequencies for
                    u = u,  f Au,, where u,  is the critical value; an equal and opposite amount of  ‘damping’,
                    hi, is  added  to  the  nonlinear  part  of  the  equation,  thus  cancelling  the  total  added
                    damping. Also added to the nonlinear part of  the equation are the gravity terms, which
                    are  small. These  addenda to  the  nonlinear part  of  the  equation  are  significant in  the
                    discussion of the results.
                      Unfortunately, not  all parameters are defined in the results obtained. It  is mentioned
                    that,  ‘for a  steel or plastic  pipe  in.  in  diameter and  2 ft  in  length’ and  j3 = 0.5, the
                    gravity parameter is y  = 0.01 and 0.3, respectively; so, presumably y  is in that range for
                    the calculations in Figure 5.18. The dimensions also give a clue as to the likely value for
                    the fluid friction constant a in equation (5.53), which can play an important role in the
                    dynamics (Bajaj et al. 1980).
   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353