Page 349 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 349

PIPES CONVEYING FLUID: NONLINEAR AND CHAOTIC DYNAMICS          329


























                         0     0.1   0.2    0.3   0.4    0.5   0.6    0.7   0.8
                                                    B

             Figure 5.18  Limit  cycle  amplitude  of  free  end  of  a  cantilevered  pipe,  AID,  versus  B  for
             IAu,l  = 0.1; curves  1, 2,  3 represent  solutions with  IAu,l  = 1 and  unusually  small  amplitude
                                      (Rousselet & Herrmann  1981).

               The  main  result  obtained, Figure 5.18,  shows the  amplitude of  the  limit cycle  as  a
             function of B  for  lAu,l  = 0.1 or  1. Also indicated (as S or D) is whether the effect of
             nonlinearities is stabilizing or destabilizing. It is here, however, that it must be recognized
             that the ‘nonlinearities’ include the linear gravity and reversed damping terms; as a result,
             the regions in  which  ‘nonlinearities’ are destabilizing is not necessarily associated with
             a subcritical Hopf bifurcation, since the damping which has been added artificially (the
             ktarj term) can also lead to destabilization (Section 3.5.3).
               It is observed in Figure 5.18 that AID > 0.15 in most cases, where A is the limit-cycle
             amplitude, indicating that a relatively large amplitude of motion is required to compensate
             for the small amount of positive or negative damping associated with  IAu,~.~ This shows
             that the ‘nonlinearities’, as expected, do not have a strong effect on the system, except in
             the vicinity of  the ‘jumps’ or S-shaped curves in the stability diagram, at B E 0.295 and
             0.67 (see Figures 3.30 and 3.32).* IAu,l  = 0.1 corresponds to approximately only 1% of
             u,,  IAu,l  = 1 to about 10%. The infinite amplitudes correspond to effectively zero effect
             of  the  ‘nonlinearities’, at least in terms of the first-order averaging approximation.
               A  variant of  the system was considered by Lundgren et al. (1979): a horizontal pipe,
             fitted with an inclined nozzle at the free end (at angle 0,  and terminal flow velocity  Uj),
             as shown in Figure 5.19(a), and subjected to a deformation-independent flow velocity. As
             a result of the sideways load by the exiting fluid jet, the shape of the pipe in the plane of
             the nozzle is changed continually as u is increased. The static equilibrium of  the pipe is

               +To a certain extent,  ‘small’ and  ‘large’ are dependent on the nondimensionalization.
               $The dynamics in the  vicinity  of  @ = 0.295 is much more complex, and  several  solution curves are deter-
             mined by  Rousselet & Henmann (1981).
   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354