Page 487 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 487

CURVED PIPES CONVEYING FLUID                     457









                                                                    ,


















             Figure 6.21  Argand diagram of the lowest two eigenvalues hj = wji, j  = 1, 2, for in-plane motion
             of  a  semi-circular  cantilevered  pipe  conveying  fluid,  as  functions  of  V  defined  in  the  text,  for
                      = 0.5, R/a = 40, according to extensible theory (Dupuis & Rousselet  1986).

               The purpose  of  this  rather  tedious  discussion  is to  show that  most  of  the  results  for
             cantilevered  pipes  conveying  fluid  are  tinged  with  uncertainty:  those  obtained  by  the
             modified inextensible theory (Misra et al. 1988a) because of the limitations of that theory,
             those by the extensible theory (Doll & Mote  1974; Dupuis & Rousselet  1985, 1986) by
             other worrisome features, and those on the effect of  dissipation (Aithal & Gipson  1990)
             for several reasons.
               However, taking all the results together, a number of  common features emerge which
             lead  to  the  following  consensual,  reasonably  well-founded  conclusions:  (i) unlike  for
             curved pipes with supported ends, the eigenfrequencies of cantilevered pipes are strongly
             dependent on E*, just as they are for straight cantilevered pipes conveying fluid; (ii) for
             sufficiently  high  E*,  the  system  loses  stability  by  divergence  or  flutter  depending  on
             the  theory  used  for  in-plane  motions,  and  by  flutter  for  out-of-plane  motions;  (iii) for
             reasonable values of  /?, the critical flow velocities for loss of  stability are in the range of
             -
             UF  2: 0.4-0.8.

             6.5.2  Nonlinear and chaotic dynamics

             Steindl & Troger (1994) studied the nonlinear in-plane dynamics of  curved pipes  as an
             extension  of  Champneys’  (1991) work discussed  in Sections 5.6.2 and 5.8.5.  Instead  of
             an articulated system they use a continuously flexible one, and instead of the initial angle
             between the two articulations as the secondary bifurcation parameter  (the primary being
             the flow) they use the pipe initial curvature, K:  = L/Ro = 0,. The equations of motion are
             derived by means of director rod theory (Buzano et al. 1985; Simo 1985). The pipe centreline
             is assumed to be inextensible, but changes in shape with increasing flow (i.e. the effects
             of steady fluid forces on the dynamics) are taken into account, as shown in Figure 6.22.
   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492