Page 150 - Formation Damage during Improved Oil Recovery Fundamentals and Applications
P. 150

Formation Damage by Fines Migration: Mathematical and Laboratory Modeling, Field Cases  129


              zero for X w , X , X mJ in areas A and B, and equal to maximum retention
              function for X . X mJ in areas C and D:

                          8
                                    0;           X w , X , X mJ ; T . X 2 X w
                          >
                          >
                                0           1
                          <
                S a X; Tð  Þ 5  1    q  ffiffiffiffi ; γ  ;                         :
                            φ
                          >   S cr  @  p   J  A  X mJ , X , N; T . X 2 X w
                          >       2πr e X
                          :
                                                                        (3.130)
                 Therefore, the attached concentration corresponds to the value of the
              maximum retention function of γ I ahead of salinity front X-X w 5 T, and
              of γ J behind this front. The attached concentrations are steady state,
              which cancels S a in the accumulative term of the mass balance
              Eq. (3.120). Substituting the straining rate (Eq. (3.121)) into Eq. (3.120)
              yields:
                                  @c     @c        αΛc
                                     1 α    52 p p                      (3.131)
                                                   ffiffiffiffi ffiffiffiffiffiffi :
                                 @T      @X      2 X X w
                 In zones 0, 1, and 3 (Fig. 3.20B), Eq. (3.131) subject to initial condi-
              tions (Eq. (3.126)) is solved by the method of characteristics. Here, time
              T is set as the parameter along the characteristic lines:

                dX                                  dc        αΛc
                                                               ffiffiffiffi ffiffiffiffiffiffi ;
                   5 α; X 2 X w 2 X 0 5 α T 2 T 0 Þ;   52 p p           (3.132)
                                         ð
                dT                                  dT      2 X X w
              where X 0 corresponds to the intersection of the characteristic line with
              the X-axis. Formula (Eq. (3.126)) for the suspended concentration for
              three X-intervals provides initial conditions for the ordinary differential
              Eqs. (3.132) in zones 3, 1, and 0, respectively.
                 Separation of variables in Eq. (3.132) yields explicit formulae for sus-
              pended concentration. In zone 0, the initial suspended concentration is
              zero. The solution along characteristic lines yields zero suspended con-
              centration in the overall zone 0.
                 In zone 3, the initial suspended concentration c is a constant given by
              Eq. (3.126). The solution c(X,T) along characteristics is given by the for-
              mula listed in the tenth row of Table 3.8. The solution is independent of
              X in zone 3. The solution in zone 1 with X-distributed initial suspended
              concentration given by formula (Eq. (3.126)) is presented in the formula
              given in the ninth row of Table 3.8.
   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155