Page 155 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 155
REFERENCES 135
adsorption and mercury‐intrusion techniques. SPE Reserv Jacobi DJ, Gladkikh M, LeCompte B, Hursan G, Mendez F, Longo
Eval Eng 2012b;15:648–661. J, Ong S, Bratovich M, Patton GL, Shoemaker P. Integrated
Cluff RM, Shanley KW, Miller MA. Three things we thought we petrophysical evaluation of gas shale reservoirs. CIPC/SPE Gas
understood about gas shale, but were afraid to ask. AAPG Technology Symposium—Joint Conference, Calgary, AB,
Annual Convention, Long Beach, CA, USA; April 1–4, 2007. Canada. SPE114925; June 16–19, 2008. SPE.
Coates GR, Xiao L, Prammer MG. NMR Logging: Principles and Jarvie DM, Hill RJ, Ruble TE, Pollastro RM. Unconventional
Applications. Houston (TX): Haliburton Energy Services shale‐gas systems: The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north‐
Publication; 1999. central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale‐gas
Cui X, Bustin AMM, Bustin RM. Measurements of gas perme assessment. AAPG Bull 2007;91:475–499.
ability and diffusivity of tight reservoir rocks: Different Javadpour F. Nanopores and apparent permeability of gas flow
approaches and their applications. Geofluids 2009;9: in mudrocks (Shales and Siltstone). J Can Petrol Technol
208–223. 2009;48:16–21.
Curtis ME, Ambrose RJ, Sondergeld CH. Structural characteriza Javadpour F, Fisher D, Unsworth M. Nanoscale Gas Flow in Gas
tion of gas shale on the micro‐ and nano‐scales. Canadian Uncon shale Sediments. J Can Petrol Technol 2007;46:55–61.
ventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference; Jones SC. A Technique for faster pulse‐decay permeability
Calgary, AB, Canada. SPE137693; October 19–21, 2010. measurements in tight rocks. SPE Formation Eval 1997;12:
Darabi H, Ettehad A, Javadpour F, Sepehrnoori K. Gas flow in 19–26.
ultra‐tight shale strata. J Fluid Mech 2012;710:641–658. Karastathis A. Petrophysical measurements on tight gas shale
Dresser Atlas. Log Interpretation Charts. Houston (TX): Dresser [MSc, thesis]. University of Oklahoma; 2007. 117 pp.
Atlas Publication; 1983. Keller JU, Staudt R. Gas adsorption equilibria: Experimental
Easley TG, Sigal R, Rai C. Thermogravimetric analysis of Barnett methods and adsorptive isotherms. New York: Springer; 2005.
shale samples. International Symposium of the Society of Core 422 pp.
Analysts; Calgary, AB, Canada, September 10–12, 2007. Keller LM, Holzer L, Wepf R, Gaser P. 3D geometry and topology
Society of Core Analyst (SCA). of pore pathways in Opalinus clay: Implications for mass trans
Fertl WH, Rieke HH. Gamma ray spectral evaluation techniques port. Appl Clay Sci 2011;52:85–95.
identify fractured shale reservoirs and source‐rock characteris Kochenov AV, Baturin GN. The paragenesis of organic matter,
tics. J Petrol Technol 1980;32:2053–2062. phosphorus, and uranium in marine sediments. Lithol Mine
Franquet JA, Bratovich MW, Glass RD. State‐of‐the‐Art Openhole Resour 2002;37:107–120.
gas shale logging. SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium Labani MM, Kadkhodaie‐Ilkhchi A, Salahshoor K. Estimation of
and Exhibition; Al‐Khobar, Saudi Arabia. SPE160862; 2012. NMR log parameters from conventional well log data using a
Giesche H. Mercury porosimetry: A general (practical) overview. committee machine with intelligent systems: A case study from
Particle Syst Character 2006;23:9–19. the Iranian part of the South Pars gas field, Persian Gulf Basin.
Glorioso JC, Rattia AJ. Unconventional reservoirs: Basic J Petrol Sci Eng 2010;72:175–185.
petrophysical concepts for gas shale. SPE/EAGE European Labani MM, Rezaee, R. Thermal maturity estimation of gas shale
Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition; Vienna, layers from conventional well log data: A case study from
Austria. SPE153004; March 20–22, 2012. SPE/EAGE. Kockatea Shale and Carynginia Formation of Perth Basin,
Grieser WV, Bray JM. Identification of production potential Australia. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and
in unconventional reservoirs. Production and Operations Exhibition, Perth, WA, Australia. SPE158864; October 22–24,
Symposium; Oklahoma City, OK, USA. SPE106623; March 2012. SPE.
31–April 3, 2007. SPE. Labani MM, Rezaee R, Saeedi A, Al‐Hinai A. Evaluation of pore
Handwerger DA, Keller J, Vaughn K. Improved petrophysical core size spectrum of gas shale reservoirs using low pressure nitrogen
measurements on tight shale reservoirs using retort and crushed adsorption, gas expansion and mercury porosimetry: A case
samples. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition; study from the Perth and Canning Basins, Western Australia. J
Denver, CO, USA. SPE147456; October 30–November 2, 2011. Petrol Sci Eng 2013;112:7–16.
Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE). Lim DI, Jung HS, Yang SY, Yoo HS. Sequential growth of early
Handwerger DA, Willberg DM, Pagels M, Rowland B, Keller J. diagenetic freshwater siderites in the Holocene coastal deposits,
Reconciling retort versus dean stark measurements on tight Korea. Sedimentary Geol 2004;169:107–120.
shales. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Loucks RG, Reed RM, Ruppel SC, Hammes U. Spectrum of pore
Antonio, TX, USA. SPE159976; October 8–10, 2012. SPE. types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classifi
Jacobi DJ, Breig JJ, Le Compte B, Kopal M, Hursan G, Mendez cation for matrix‐related mudrock pores. AAPG Bull
FE, Bliven S, Longo J. Effective geochemical and geomechani 2012;96:1071–1098.
cal characterization of gas shale reservoirs from the wellbore Loucks RG, Reed RM, Ruppel SC. Jarvie DM. Morphology, gen
environment: Caney and the Woodford Shale. SPE Annual esis, and distribution of nanometer‐scale pores in siliceous mud
Technical Conference and Exhibition; New Orleans, LA, USA. stones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale. J Sedimentary Res
SPE124231; October 4–7, 2009. SPE. 2009;79:848–861.
