Page 285 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs

REFERENCES 265
Cui X, Bustin AM, Bustin R. Measurements of gas permeability and Javadpour F, Farshi M, Amrein M. Atomic‐force microscopy: a
diffusivity of tight reservoir rocks: different approaches and their new tool for gas‐shale characterization. J Can Pet Technol
applications. J Geofluids 2009;9:208–223. 2012;51:236–243. DOI: 10.2118/161015‐PA.
Dana E, Skoczylas F. Gas relative permeability and pore structure Jones SC. A technique for faster pulse‐decay permeability mea-
of sandstones. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1999;36:613–625. surements in tight rocks. SPE Formation Eval; 1997; March
Darabi H, Ettehad A, Javadpour F, Sepehrnoori K. Gas Flow in issue 19–25. doi:10.2118/28450‐PA
ultra‐tight shale strata. J Fluid Mech FirstView 2012:1–18. Jones FO, Owens WW. A laboratory study of low‐permeability gas
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2012.424. sands. Paper SPE 7541‐PA. J Pet Technol 1980;1631–1640.
Darcy H. Les Fontaines Publiques de la Ville de Dijon. Paris: doi:10.2118/7551‐PA
Dalmont; 1856. Kaczmarek M. Approximate solutions for non‐stationary gas per-
Dicker AI, Smits RM. A practical approach for determining perme- meability tests. Transp Porous Media 2008. DOI: 10.1007/
ability from laboratory pressure‐pulse decay measurements. s11242‐008‐9216‐x.
SPE 1988;15578:285–292. Karniadakis G, Beskok A, Aluru N. Microflows and Nanoflows:
Do DD. Adsorption analysis: equilibria and kinetics. In: Yang RT, Fundamentals and Simulation. New York: Springer
editor. Series on Chemical Engineering. Volume 2, London: Science+Business Media, Inc.; 2005.
Imperial College Press; 1998. p 543–545. Klinkenberg LJ. The Permeability of Porous Media to Liquids
Egermann P, Lenormand R, Longeron D, Zarcone C. A fast and and Gases. API Drilling and Production Practice, USA; 1941.
direct method of permeability measurements on drill cuttings. p 200–213.
SPE Reserv Eval Eng August 2005; 269–275. Lancaster DE, Hill DG. A multi‐laboratory comparison of isotherm
Etminan SR, Javadpour F, Maini BB, Chen Z. Measurement of gas measurements of Antrim shale samples. 1993 SCA Conference
storage processes in shale and of the molecular diffusion coeffi- Paper Number 9303; 1993; Otsego County, MI. p 1–16.
cient in Kerogen. Int J Coal Geol 2014;123:10–19. Lasseux D, Jolly P, Jannot Y, Omnes ESB. Permeability
Finsterle S, Persoff P. Determining permeability of tight rock sam- measurement of graphite compression packings. Trans ASME J
ples using inverse modelling. Water Resour Res 1997;33 Press Vessel Technol 2011;133:041401.
(8):1803–1811.
Florence FA, Rushing JA, Newsham KE, Blasingame TA. Improved Loucks RG, Reed RM, Ruppel SC, Hammes U. Spectrum of pore
types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification
permeability prediction relations for low‐permeability sands. for matrix‐related mudrock pores. AAPG Bull 2012;96
Paper SPE 107954‐MS Presented at SPE Rocky Mountain Oil and (6):1071–1098. DOI: 10.1306/08171111061.
Gas Technology Symposium; April 16–18, 2007; Denver, CO.
Groen JC, Peffer LAA, Pérez‐Ramírez J. Pore Size determination Mehmani A, Prodanovic M, Javadpour F. Multiscale multiphysics
network modeling of shale matrix gas flows. Transp Porous
in modified micro‐ and mesoporous materials. Pitfalls and limi- Media 2013;99:377–390. DOI: 10.1007/s11242‐013‐0191‐5.
tations in gas adsorption data analysis. Microporous Mesoporous
Mater 2003;60 (1–3):1–17. Mehrotra S. On the implementation of a primal‐dual interior point
Haskett SE, Narahara GM, Holditch SA. A method for the simulta- method. SIAM J. Optim 1992;2 (4):575–601.
neous determination of permeability and porosity in low perme- Milliken KL, Esch WL, Reed RM, Zhang T. Grain assemblages and
ability cores. SPE 1988;15379:1–11. strong diagenetic overprinting in siliceous mudrocks, barnett
Homand F, Giraud A, Escoffier S, Koriche A, Hoxha D. Permeability shale (Mississippian), Fort Worth Basin, Texas. AAPG Bull
determination of a deep argillite in saturated and partially satu- 2012;96 (8):1553–1578. DOI: 10.1306/12011111129.
rated conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2004;47:3517–3531. Moghanloo RG, Javadpour F, Davudov D. Contribution of methane
Hsieh PA, Tracy JV, Neuzil CE, Bredehoeft JD, Silliman SE. A molecular diffusion in kerogen to gas‐in‐place and production.
transient laboratory method for determining the hydraulic prop- SPE 165376, SPE Western Regional & AAPG Pacific Section
erties of “tight” rocks—I. Theory. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Meeting, 2013 Joint Technical Conference; April 19–25, 2013;
Geomech Abstr 1981;18:245–252. Monterey, CA.
Ivanov AN, Kozlova SN, Pechenov AV. Permeability measurement. Neuzil CE, Cooley C, Silliman SE, Bredehoeft JD, Hsieh PA. A
Meas Tech 2000;43 (12):1086–1088. transient laboratory method for determining the hydraulic prop-
Jannot Y, Lasseux D, Vize G, Hamon G. A detailed analysis of per- erties of ‘tight’ rocks—II. Application. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
meability and Klinkenberg coefficient estimation from unsteady‐ Geomech Abstr 1981;18:253–258.
state pulse‐decay or draw‐down experiments, 2007. International Newberg MA, Arastoopour H. Analysis of the flow of gas through
Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts; 2007; Calgary, low‐permeability porous media. SPE Reserv Eng 1986:
Canada; Paper SCA2007‐08. 647–653.
Javadpour F. Nanopores and apparent permeability of gas flow in Ross D, Bustin RM. Impact of mass balance calculations on adsorp-
mudrocks (shales and siltstone). J Can Pet Technol 2009;48 tion capacities in microporous shale gas reservoirs. Fuel
(8):16–21. DOI: 10.2118/09‐08‐16‐DA. 2007;86:2696–2706.
Javadpour F, Fisher D, Unsworth M. Nanoscale gas flow in Roy S, Raju R, Chuang HF, Cruden BA, Meyyappan M. Modeling
shale gas sediments. J Can Pet Technol 2007;46 (10):55–61. gas flow through microchannels and nanopores. J Appl Phys
DOI: 10.2118/07‐10‐06. 2003;93:4870–4879.