Page 87 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 87

REFERENCES    67
              from the Norwegian North Sea. Geochim Cosmochim  Acta   Jarvie DM. Williston Basin petroleum systems: inferences from oil
              2006; 70, 15:3943–3956.                              geochemistry and geology. Mount Geol 2001;38 (1):19–41.
            Ertas D, Kelemen SR, Halsey  TC. Petroleum expulsion Part 1.   Jarvie  DM.  Hydrocarbon  generation  and  storage  in  the  Barnett
              Theory of kerogen swelling in multicomponent solvents. Energy   Shale, Ft. Worth  Basin, SPE Houston  Chapter meeting; May
              Fuels 2006;20:295–300.                               2006; Houston, TX. Available at http://www.wwgeochem.com/
            Espitalie J, Madec M, Tissot B, Mennig JJ, Leplat P. Source rock   resources/Jarvie+­+SPE+Houston+April+19+2006+
              characterization method for petroleum exploration: Proceedings   presentation+­+submitted.pdf. Accessed November 12, 2013.
              of the 9th Offshore Technology Conference, Volume 3, Paper   Jarvie DM. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: Part 1—shale
              2935; 1977. pp 439–444.                              gas resource systems, In: Breyer J, editor. Shale Reservoirs—
            Espitalie J, Madec M, Tissot B. Geochemical logging. In: Voorhees   Giant Resources for the 21st century. AAPG Memoir 2012a;
              KJ, editor. Analytical Pyrolysis—Techniques and Applications.   97:69–87.
              Boston: Butterworth; 1984. p 276–304.              Jarvie DM. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: Part 2—Shale
            Fabuss BM, Smith JO, Satterfield CN. Thermal cracking of pure   oil resource systems, In: Breyer J, editor. Shale Reservoirs—
              saturated hydrocarbons. In: McKetta JJ, editor.  Advances in   Giant Resources for the 21st century. AAPG Memoir 2012b;
              Petroleum Chemistry and Refining. New York: John Wiley &   97:89–119.
              Sons, Inc.; 1964. p 157–201.                       Jarvie DM, Hill RJ, Ruble  TE, Pollastro RM. Unconventional
            Ford TJ. Liquid‐phase thermal decomposition of hexadecane: reac­  shale‐gas systems: The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north‐
              tion mechanisms. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 1986;25:240–243.  central  Texas as one model for thermogenic shale‐gas
            Frolich C, Potter E. What further research could teach us about   assessment. AAPG Bull 2007;91 (4):475–499.
              “Close Encounters of the Third Kind”: intraplate earthquakes   Jarvie DM, Coskey RJ, Johnson MS, Leonard JE. The Geology and
              associated with fluid injection. In: Chatelier J‐Y, Jarvie DM,   Geochemistry of the Parshall Field Area, Mountrail County,
              editors.  AAPG Memoir 103, Critical  Assessment of Shale   North Dakota. In: Robinson JW, LeFever JA, Gaswirth SB, edi­
              Resource Plays. Tulsa, OK: American Association of Petroleum   tors. Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists’ (RMAG) The
              Geologists; 2013. p 109–119.                         Bakken‐Three Forks Petroleum System in the Williston Basin.
            Fuhrmann  A,  Thompson KFM, di Primio R, Dieckmann  V.   Denver: RMAG; 2011. p 229–281.
              Insight into Petroleum Composition Based on Thermal and   Jarvie DM, Jarvie B, Courson D, Garza  T, Jarvie J, Rocher D.
              Catalytic Cracking. 21st IMOG, poster presentation; Krakow,   Geochemical tools for assessment of tight oil reservoirs,
              Poland; 2003.                                        Geochemical tools for the assessment of shale oil plays, AAPG/
            Fusetti L, Behar F, Bounaceur R, Marquaire PM, Grice K, Derene   SEG/SPE/SPWLA Hedberg Conference: Critical Assessment
                                                                   of Shale Resource Plays; Austin, TX; December 10–15, 2010;
              S. New insights into secondary gas generation from oil thermal   AAPG Memoir 103, Critical  Assessment of Shale Resource
              cracking: methylated monoaromatics. A kinetic approach using   Plays. Chatelier J‐Y, Jarvie DM, editors, extended abstract;
              1,2,4‐trimethylbenzene. Part I: a free‐radical mechanism. Org   2013; 2p.
              Geochem 2010a;41:146–167.                          Jones RW. Comparison of Carbonate and Shale Source Rocks. In:
            Fusetti L, Behar F, Grice K, Derene S. New insights into secondary   Palacas J, editor.  Petroleum Geochemistry and Source Rock
              gas generation from oil thermal cracking: methylated monoaro­  Potential of Carbonate Rocks. Volume 18, AAPG Studies in
              matics. A kinetic approach using 1,2,4‐trimethylbenzene. Part   Geology; 1984. p 163–180.
              II: a lumped kinetic scheme. Org Geochem 2010b;41:168–176.  Landis CR, Castaño JR. Maturation and bulk chemical properties
            Gao L, Schimmelmann A, Tang Y, Mastalerz M. Isotope rollover in   of a suite of solid hydrocarbons. Org Geochem 1995;22:
              shale gas observed in laboratory pyrolysis experiments: insight   137–149.
              to  the  role  of  water  in  thermogenesis  of  mature  gas.  Org
              Geochem 2014;74:59–65.                             Levine JA. Physical sorption of gases: implications for resources,
                                                                   reserves, and production from sorbed gas reservoir systems,
            Hao F, Zou H. Cause of shale gas geochemical anomalies and   AAPG/SEG/SPE/SPWLA Hedberg Conference: Critical
              mechanisms for gas enrichment and depletion in high‐maturity   Assessment of Shale Resource Plays; Austin, TX; December
              shales. Mar Pet Geol 2013;44:1–12.                   10–15, 2010; AAPG Memoir 103, Critical Assessment of Shale
            Hill RJ, Jarvie DM, Zumberge J, Henry M, Pollastro RM. Oil and   Resource Plays. Chatelier J‐Y, Jarvie DM, editors, extended
              gas geochemistry and petroleum systems of the Fort  Worth   abstract; 2013. 4p.
              Basin. AAPG Bull 2007;91 (4):445–473.              Li P, Ratchford ME, Jarvie DM. Geochemistry and thermal maturity
            Horsfield B, Disko U, Leistner F. The micro‐scale simulation of   analysis of the Fayetteville Shale and Chattanooga Shale in the
              maturation: outline of a new technique and its potential applica­  Western Arkoma Basin of Arkansas, Arkansas Geological Survey,
              tions. Geol Rundsch 1989;78:361–374.                 Information Circular 40, DFF‐OG‐FS‐EAB/ME 012. 2010.
            Horsfield B, Leistner F, Hall K. Microscale sealed vessel pyrol­  Lis GP, Mastalerz M, Schimmelmann A. Increasing maturity of
              ysis, In: Grice K, editor. Principles and Practice of Analytical     kerogen type II reflected by alkylbenzene distribution from
              Techniques in Geosciences. Cambridge: Royal Society of   pyrolysis‐gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry. Org Geochem
              Chemistry; 2015. 600p, pp. 209–250.                  2008;39:440–449.
            Hunt JM.  Petroleum Geochemistry and Geology. 2nd ed. New   Locke DE,  Winans RE. X‐ray characterization of type I Green
              York: Freeman WH & Co.; 1995. p 743.                 River Oil Shale Kerogen, presentation at Houston Organic
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92