Page 94 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 94

74   SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY OF UNCONVENTIONAL RESOURCE SHALES



                                                                                         Woodford



                                                                                         Hunton
                                                                                         Sylvan
                                                                                         Viola
                                                                                         500´

                                                                            Stover 26 #2

            FIGurE 4.3  Woodford seismic interval showing the highstand downlap seismic pattern onto the Hunton unconformity. After May and
            Anderson (2011) who have provided permission to publish this figure.


            4.5  CrITErIa TO IDENTIFy SEQuENCES                  2008; Slatt et al., 2012). It is several hundred feet (m) thick.
            aND SySTEmS TraCTS                                   The Barnett overlies an erosional unconformity (SB) mark­
                                                                 ing the top of the Ellenburger (and sometimes the Viola)
            Because of the lack of high‐frequency chronostratigraphy,   Limestone (Fig. 4.4) (Baruch et al., 2012). It was deposited
            other criteria must be used to recognize stratigraphic   over a 22 Myr time interval based on conodont ages (Loucks
            sequences  superimposed  at  different  scales.  Such  criteria   and Ruppel, 2007; Pollastro, 2007), thus making it a second‐
            include the gamma ray log responses described for    order depositional sequence. A high gamma ray, organic‐
            Figure 4.1, stratigraphic changes in fauna, mineralogy and   rich interval immediately overlies the unconformity, and
            organic matter (TOC and geochemical biomarkers), and   above that interval, the strata generally provide a lower
            seismic responses such as downlap of HST onto an mfs   gamma ray log response (Fig. 4.4).
            (Fig. 4.3).                                            Fourteen to  sixteen higher  frequency cycles comprise
              In this chapter, emphasis is placed upon the commonly   the Barnett Shale, so by dividing the total number of high‐
            observed upward increase in API units to the CS and mfs,   frequency sequences by 22 Myr, these are interpreted as
            followed by an upward decrease in API units of the HST   third‐order sequences (app. 1.5 Myr average) (Abouelresh and
            (Fig. 4.1). This systematic pattern is the result of systematic   Slatt, 2012a, b; Singh, 2008). Several sequences thin/pinchout
            variations  in  the  aforementioned  criteria.  The  TST/CS  is   toward the south, away from the northerly source area
            generally enriched in clays and organic matter, and HSTs   (Fig. 4.4). At the second‐order scale, the Forestburg Limestone
            tend to be enriched in somewhat coarser‐grained, detrital   separates the Barnett into lower and upper intervals toward
            carbonate  and/or quartz. Laterally, the  TST is deposited   the northeast (Fig. 4.5). The Forestburg and higher frequency
            either horizontally or with a slight seaward dip, while the   sequences downlap onto the basal organic‐rich, high API gamma
            younger HST deposits are more prone to downlap, espe­  ray interval.  The upper Barnett is dominated by   calcareous
            cially in their more updip areas (Fig. 4.1). On seismic reflec­  mudstones while the lower Barnett is dominated by siliceous
            tion records, if the vertical resolution is sufficient, then the   mudstones (Abouelresh and Slatt, 2012).
            HST downlap pattern can be identified (Fig. 4.3). Also, pub­  Third‐order sequences generally exhibit a “cleaning‐
            lished examples presented in the following uniformly refer   upward” gamma ray log response due to an upward increase
            to the base of the resource shale as sitting atop an unconfor­  in calcareous mudstones and fossils, indicating an upward
            mity surface based upon erosional surfaces and biostratig­  shallowing of water during deposition (Fig. 4.6). Occasionally,
            raphy. These details are not presented in the following for   the reverse stratigraphy is recognized, indicating an upward
            each  example,  so  the  reader  is  referred  to  the  individual   deepening during deposition (Fig.  4.6).  The second‐ and
              references for their description.                  third‐order scales conform to the earlier‐described general
                                                                 sequence stratigraphic model (Fig. 4.1).


            4.6  PaLEOZOIC rESOurCE SHaLE EXamPLES
                                                                 4.6.2  Woodford Shale (Late Devonian–Early
            4.6.1  Barnett Shale (Devonian)                      mississippian)

            The Barnett Shale is a prolific gas and oil producer in the   The Woodford Shale is the main hydrocarbon source rock in
            Fort Worth Basin of Texas, thus it has been studied exten­  the oil/gas‐rich state of Oklahoma, USA. It occurs in the
            sively (summarized in Abouelresh and Slatt, 2012a, b; Singh,   Anadarko, Arkoma, Ardmore, and Marietta basins and the
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99