Page 96 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 96

76   SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY OF UNCONVENTIONAL RESOURCE SHALES





                                                Core gamma ray scan  (c)                    (d)
                Core             Core gemma ray  0.0   (CPM)   1000
                                  scan (CPM)
                                 0.0   1000
                          GRP-14
                          GRP-13                50
            300           GRP-12                ft.
                          GRP-11
                                                                    (b)                     (e)
                          GRP-10
            400      Forestburg

            500           GRP-9
                          GRP-8
                          GRP-7
                          GRP-6
                          GRP-5                                     (a)
            600                                                                             (f)
                          GRP-4
                          GRP-3

                          GRP-2
            700
                          GRP-1
                          TSE
                                  Viola
                                                 More clay upward  Less clay upward




            FIGurE 4.6  Core gamma scan and basic core description for the well shown in Figure 4.4. Two high‐frequency sequences are highlighted,
            one that is increasing upward in API (arrow points to the right) and the other decreasing API (arrow points to the left). Thin sections of the
            first sequence show an upward change in lithologies from clay‐organic rich mudstone to fossiliferous mudstone; thin sections of the second
            sequence show the opposite trend with the carbonate rich interval being dolomite in this case. Modified from Singh (2008) who provided
            permission to publish this figure.

            Cherokee Platform, all within a regional fold and thrust belt   to third‐order cycles based upon an average of 3.6 Myr for
            tectonic setting (Johnson et al., 1989). It also has recently   each cycle (29 Myr/8 = 3.6 Myr average).
            become a reservoir rock owing to horizontal drilling and   The outcrop gamma ray log is correlative with another out­
            artificial fracturing, leading to its extensive study (summarized   crop gamma ray log obtained about 32 km (20 mi.) away as well
            in Molinares‐Blanco, 2013; Serna‐Bernal, 2013; Slatt et al.,   as to a subsurface well about 80 km (50 mi.) away (Fig. 4.8).
            2012). The Woodford has traditionally been subdivided into   About 130 km (80 mi.) distance from the McAlester
            lower, middle, and upper intervals (Paxton and Cardott,   Cemetary Quarry, a research well was drilled behind another
            2008); total thickness varies from less than 100 to several   quarry—the Wyche Farm Quarry (Portas, 2009)—to a depth
            hundred feet (m) thick, with a general southerly (basinward)   of 55 m (180 ft), which is 0.6 m (2 ft) above the contact with
            thickening. Based on conodont biostratigraphy, it was depos­  the Hunton Limestone (Molinares‐Blanco, 2013). Spectral
            ited over a 29 Myr time interval (second‐order cycle). At   and conventional gamma ray log and an FMI  log were
                                                                                                       TM
            one location—the McAlester Cemetary Quarry—a complete   obtained from the well, in addition to core description.
            120 m (400 ft) thick, steeply dipping, Woodford stratigraphic   Palynological analysis, coupled with these data, revealed a
            section is exposed (Paxton and Cardott, 2008; Serna‐Bernal,   similar stratigraphy between the two areas (Fig. 4.9). The
            2013).  The  Woodford overlies an erosional unconformity   stratigraphy correlates with the global Devonian transgres­
            (SB) at the top of the Hunton Limestone. An outcrop gamma   sive–regressive cycles of Johnson et al. (1985) (Fig. 4.9).
            ray log, obtained with a Scintrex Scintillometer , coupled   There is a good match among the third‐order cycles identi­
                                                   TM
            with geologic characterization revealed at least eight high‐  fied by Johnson et al. (1985), and those seen in the two Woodford
            frequency cycles (Fig. 4.7), superimposed upon the 120 m   logs. In particular, global transgressions during upper Frasnian
            (400 ft) stratigraphic interval. These are presumed equivalent   time (shown as LK and UK in Fig. 4.9) correlate well with the
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101