Page 359 - Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing
P. 359

moment  only  a  specific  target  Doppler  shift,  the  improvement  factor  can  be

               written in the form






                                                                                                       (5.48)


               where G is the filter gain. Figure 5.9 makes clear that the effect of the MTI filter

               on the target signal is a strong function of the target Doppler shift. Thus, G is a
               function of target velocity, while clutter attenuation CA is not. The improvement
               factor is the signal processing gain G  in the radar range equation due to MTI
                                                            sp
               filtering.
                     To reduce I to a single number instead of a function of target Doppler, the
               definition  calls  for  averaging  uniformly  over  all  target  Doppler  shifts  “of
               interest.” If a target is known to be at a specific velocity, the improvement factor

               can be obtained by simply evaluating Eq. (5.48) at the known target Doppler. It
               is more common to assume the target velocity is unknown a priori and use the
               average target gain over all possible Doppler shifts, which is just







                                                                                                       (5.49)

               An alternative expression for the gain that is often easier to compute for simple
               MTI  filters  follows  from  converting Eq. (5.49) back to normalized frequency
               units and applying Parseval’s theorem:







                                                                                                       (5.50)

               For example, a two-pulse canceller has only two nonzero coefficients, +1 and –

               1,  giving  immediately G  =  2.  Combining Eqs. (5.47)  and (5.49)  in  gives  the
               expression for the improvement factor












                                                                                                       (5.51)


                     Equivalent expressions for improvement factor can be developed in terms
   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364