Page 418 - Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing
P. 418

FIGURE 5.38   Coincidence detection of target ranges in replicated range data.


                     The  graphical  interpretation  suggests  various  methods  to  reduce  the

               sensitivity  of  the  CRT  to  measurement  errors.  In  one  approach,  exact
               coincidence  is  not  required  to  declare  a  target.  Instead,  a  tolerance N   is
                                                                                                         T
               established and a detection is declared if a detection occurs in all three PRFs at
               some  range  bin n ± N .  Depending  on  the  range  bin  size  and  SNR, N   will
                                           T
                                     t
                                                                                                       T
               typically be only 1 or 2 range bins. A more sophisticated version of this basic
               idea is described in Trunk and Kim (1994). Their method combines a systematic
               approach  to  clustering  plausible  ranges  from  each  PRF  into  candidate  target

               ranges  with  a  maximum  likelihood  calculation  to  recognize  multiple  target
               situations.
                     In the last example three PRFs proved sufficient to resolve two different
               range-ambiguous  targets.  In  general, N  PRFs  are  required  to  successfully
               disambiguate N – 1 targets. If the number of targets exceeds N – 1, ghosts can
               appear  (Morris  and  Harkness,  1996).  Ghosts  are  false  targets  resulting  from

               false coincidences of range-ambiguous data from different targets. The problem
               is illustrated in Fig. 5.39, which repeats the example of Fig. 5.38 using only two
               of the previous three PRFs. While targets will still be detected at the correct
               bins n   =  6  and n  = 11, a third coincidence occurs between detections from
                                     b
                      a
               targets 1 and 2 at range bin n  = 20, representing an apparent third target. Unless
                                                 c
               additional data such as tracking information is available, the signal processor
               has no way of recognizing that the last coincidence is among detections from

               different targets. Thus, the processor will declare the presence of three targets
               in this example, the two correct targets and one “ghost.” Use of a third PRF as in
               Fig. 5.38 eliminates this ghost. More extensive discussion of ghosting in range
               and Doppler and of ghosting due to false alarms is given in Alabaster (2012).





















               FIGURE 5.39   Formation of ghosts in range ambiguity resolution.



                     In  a  medium  or  high  PRF  mode  the  radar  may  also  suffer  velocity
               ambiguities.  This  problem  is  identical  to  that  of  range  ambiguities:  given  an
   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423