Page 470 - Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing
P. 470

imaginary  parts.  The  linear  magnitude  requires  a  square  root  and  is  less

               computationally convenient.


               6.2.4   Other Unknown Parameters
               The preceding sections have shown the effect of unknown phase of the received
               signal on the optimal detector. However, other parameters of the received signal
               are also unknown in practice. The amplitude of the echo depends on all of the
               factors  in  the  radar  range  equation,  including  especially  the  unknown  target

               radar cross section and, at least until it is successfully detected, its range. In
               addition,  the  target  may  be  moving  relative  to  the  radar,  so  that  the  echo  is
               modified by a Doppler shift.
                     The derivation of the magnitude-based detectors of Secs. 6.2.2 and 6.2.3
               included  an  assumption  that  the  received  signal  amplitude  was  known.
               Specifically,  it  was  assumed  that  the  received  signal  sample  vector    was
               known, except for its absolute phase. However, as noted the absolute amplitude

               is also unknown in general. To determine the effect of an unknown amplitude,
               assume that the received signal is           , where A is an unknown but deterministic
                              11
               scale factor.  The analysis of Sec. 6.2.2 can be repeated under this assumption.
               The  detector  output  under  hypothesis H  is unchanged as would be expected,
                                                               0
               since  the  target  echo  with  its  unknown  amplitude  is  not  present  in  this  case.

               Under hypothesis H , the detector output is now                                    . Note that
                                      1
               the  detector  still  considers  the  quantity          rather  than          because  the
               arises from the matched filter applied to the data and thus does not include the
               unknown  amplitude  factor A  of  the  signal  echo. Also,  the  quantity                     is
               now the energy of the matched filter reference signal, while the actual signal

               energy becomes A E.
                                    2
                     The equivalent of Eq. (6.51) is now







                                                                                                       (6.58)

                     As before, the second argument of Eq. (6.58) can be written in terms of the
               probability of false alarm. Furthermore, because the actual signal energy is now

                 2
               A E, the first argument is still        . Thus, the detection performance is still given
               by Eq. (6.52). The unknown echo amplitude neither requires any change in the
               detector structure nor changes its performance.
                     Despite  the  unknown  amplitude,  the  sufficient  statistic  was  not  changed.
               Furthermore,  the  probability  of  false  alarm  could  be  computed  without

               knowledge of the amplitude. When both these conditions hold, the detection test
               is called a uniformly most powerful (UMP) test (Dudgeon and Johnson, 1993).
                     A  UMP  does  not  exist  for  the  case  where  the  signal  delay  (range)  is
   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475