Page 18 - Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering
P. 18
CONTENTS XVIII
Fig. 2.3 Application of PVT parameters to relate surface to reservoir hydrocarbon
volumes; below bubble point pressure 47
Fig. 2.4 Producing gas oil ratio as a function of the average reservoir pressure for a
typical solution gas drive reservoir 47
Fig. 2.5 PVT parameters (B o, R s and B g), as functions of pressure, for the analysis
presented in table 2.4; (p b = 3330 psia). 49
Fig. 2.6 Subsurface collection of PVT sample 52
Fig. 2.7 Collection of a PVT sample by surface recombination 54
Fig. 2.8 Schematic of PV cell and associated equipment 56
Fig. 2.9 Illustrating the difference between (a) flash expansion, and (b) differential
liberation 56
Fig. 3.1 Volume changes in the reservoir associated with a finite pressure drop ∆p; (a)
volumes at initial pressure, (b) at the reduced pressure 72
Fig. 3.2 Solution gas drive reservoir; (a) above the bubble point pressure; liquid oil, (b)
below bubble point; oil plus liberated solution gas 78
Fig. 3.3 Oil recovery, at 900 psia abandonment pressure (% STOIIP), as a function of the
cumulative GOR, R p (Exercise 3.2) 82
Fig. 3.4 Schematic of the production history of a solution gas drive reservoir 84
Fig. 3.5 Illustrating two ways in which the primary recovery can be enhanced; by downdip
water injection and updip injection of the separated solution gas 85
Fig. 3.6 Typical gas drive reservoir 87
Fig. 3.7 (a) Graphical method of interpretation of the material balance equation to
determine the size of the gascap (Havlena and Odeh) 88
Fig. 3.7 (b) and (c); alternative graphical methods for determining m and N (according to
the technique of Havlena and Odeh) 90
Fig. 3.8 Schematic of the production history of a typical gascap drive reservoir 91
Fig. 3.9 Trial and error method of determining the correct aquifer model (Havlena and
Odeh) 93
Fig. 3.10 Schematic of the production history of an undersaturated oil reservoir under
strong natural water drive 95
Fig. 3.11 (a) Triaxial compaction cell (Teeuw); (b) typical compaction curve 95
Fig. 3.12 Compaction curve illustrating the effect of the geological history of the reservoir
on the value of the in-situ compressibility (after Merle) 97
Fig. 4.1 Schematic of Darcy's experimental equipment 101