Page 22 - Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering
P. 22

CONTENTS                                       XXII


               Fig. 7.43   Russell afterflow analysis Exercise 7.9)                                   234

               Fig. 7.44   Match between McKinley type curves and superimposed observed buildup
                           (Exercise 7.9). o − match for small ∆t (T/F = 2500) • − match for large ∆t (T/F =
                           5000)                                                                      235

               Fig. 8.1    Radial numerical simulation model for real gas inflow                      241

                                                              2
               Fig. 8.2    Iterative calculation of p wf using the p  formulation of the radial,  semi-steady
                           state inflow equation, (8.5)                                               244

               Fig. 8.3    Real gas pseudo pressure, as a function of the actual pressure, as derived in
                           table 8.1; (Gas gravity, 0.85; Temperature 200°F)                          248

               Fig. 8.4    2p/µZ as a function of pressure                                            248

               Fig. 8.5    Calculation of p wf using the radial semi-steady state inflow equation  expressed in
                           terms of real gas pseudo pressures, (equ. 8.15)                            250

               Fig. 8.6    p/µZ as a linear function of pressure                                      251

               Fig. 8.7    Typical plot of p/µZ as a function of pressure                             252

               Fig. 8.8    Laboratory determined relationship between β and the absolute permeability A
                           relationship is usually derived of the form                                256

               Fig. 8.9    Gas well test analysis assuming semi-steady state conditions during each flow
                           period. Data; table 8.3                                                    267

               Fig. 8.10   Gas well test analysis assuming semi-steady state conditions and applying equ.
                           (8.47). Data; table 8.4                                                    268
               Fig. 8.11   MBH chart for the indicated 4:1 rectangular geometry for t DA < .01 (After
                                           15
                           Earlougher, et.al )                                                        273
               Fig. 8.12   Essis-Thomas analysis of a multi-rate gas well test under assumed transient flow
                           conditions. Data; table 8.6                                                274

               Fig. 8.13   The effect of the length of the individual flow periods on the analysis  of a multi-
                           rate gas well test; (a) 4×1 hr periods, (b) 4×2 hrs, (c) 4×4 hrs           277

               Fig. 8.14   (a) Rate-time schedule, and (b) corresponding wellbore pressure response
                           during a pressure buildup test in a gas well                               279

               Fig. 8.15   Complete analysis of a pressure buildup test in a gas well: (a) buildup analysis
                           (table 8.12); (b) and (c) transient flow analyses of the first and second flow
                           periods, respectively (table 8.10)                                         284

               Fig. 8.16   MBH plot for a well at the centre of a square, showing the deviation of m D(MBH)
                           from p D(MBH) for large values of the dimensionless flowing time t DA      287
                                                                                       10
               Fig. 8.17   Iterative determination ofp in a gas well test analysis (Kazemi )         288
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27