Page 285 - Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes : Physical, Chemical, and Biological
P. 285

240                            Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes: Physical, Chemical, and Biological



                                                               10.1.3 MIXING AS RATE LIMITING
                   BOX 10.1  MIXING IN-A-NUTSHELL
                                                               Mixing may control the reaction rate for anaerobic reactors,
              Mixing can be described in terms of a simple task such  aerobic reactors, coagulation in water treatment, oxygen dis-
              as stirring sugar into a cup of coffee or tea. The sugar  solution, gas stripping, etc. For diffusion-limited processes,
              granules, poured into a cup, come to rest on the bottom  the rate of the creation of surface area governs the total area
              and dissolve. If the solution is quiescent, the dissolved  available as a mass transfer interface. At the same time, with
              sugar molecules diffuse, in accordance with Fick’s law,  fresh area being created, a steep concentration gradient
              forming a concentration gradient from the bottom of the  (small d) is maintained between the concentration in the
              cup to the top. Over hours of time the gradient  bulk of solution, C o , and the interface concentration, C i .In
              approaches uniformity.                           other words, mixing is important in paving the way for other
                 As everyone knows, however, stirring causes the  processes to function effectively. In such cases, mixing deter-
              sugar granules to be ‘‘dispersed’’ rapidly throughout  mines the rate of mass transfer to some asymptote limit, where
              the cup. Two things occur in stirring, e.g., by a spoon:  higher mixing energy will have no further effect.
              (1) the dissolved sugar circulates throughout the cup,
              i.e., is ‘‘advected’’ by the ‘‘large-eddies’’ from the spoon,
              and (2) a ‘‘wake eddy’’ is induced and the sugar granules  10.2 HISTORY OF MIXING
              and molecules ‘‘blend’’ with the water molecules.
                                                               Mixing has been an empirical practice since the early days of
                In summary, three transport mechanisms are opera-
                                                               water treatment, i.e., about 1900 with theory getting its start in
              tive, i.e., advection, turbulence, and diffusion. They
                                                               the 1940s with the work of Camp and Stein (1943). This
              apply to virtually all mixing situations, e.g., gas trans-
                                                               section covers the evolution of theory and practice.
              fer, chemical dissolution, polymer blending, coagula-
              tion, disinfection, and oxidation reactions.
                                                               10.2.1 DRINKING WATER TREATMENT
                                                               Mixing in drinking water treatment is important in co-
            10.1.2.4  Miscible Liquids                         agulation (i.e., initial mixing or rapid mix), in flocculation
            The term ‘‘blending’’ is sometimes given to one miscible  (Chapter 11), and in disinfection. Also, mixing is required to
            liquid being dispersed, i.e., ‘‘blended’’ into another. Metering  dissolve solid chemicals (e.g., lime), to disperse polymer
            liquid alum into a water flow is an example.        emulsions, to dissolve solid polymers, to blend a liquid
                                                               chemical (e. g., fluoride), to dissolve a gas (e.g., CO 2 for pH
            10.1.2.5  Fluid Motion                             reduction), etc.
            When the required fluid motion is achieved, the other parts of
            the process will also be satisfied (Oldshue, 1983, p. 5). For an  10.2.1.1  Initial Mixing
            impeller–basin system, the characteristics of fluid motion  Willcomb (1932, p. 1427) stated that none of the plants built
            include the pumping capacity of the impeller, the flow pat-  during the period 1900–1911 under his direction had mixing.
            terns within the basin, and the shear zones and their extent and  Rather, the gravity plants had their alum introduced just
            intensities.                                       before the raw-water meter, and the pumping plants had
                                                               their alum dose added to the pump suction. By the time of
            10.1.2.6  Pumping and Shear                        his article in 1932, rapid mix as a unit process was becoming
                                                               established. Alternative mixing methods mentioned included
            The impeller energy is divided into pumping and shear.
            The proportion of each depends upon the impeller–tank sys-  aeration, the current of a flume, the turbulence associated with
            tem. Whether advection flow is preferred at the expense  a valve, and the hydraulic jump.
            of shear or vice versa depends upon the application (Oldshue,  The importance of mixing was recognized by Hansen
            1983, p. 8).                                       (1936) who noted that mixing of coagulants with raw water
                                                               was essential, followed by flocculation (he also cited
                                                               the importance of Langelier’s work in Sacramento in 1919,
            10.1.2.7  Examples
                                                               Langelier, 1921). Despite the trend toward recognizing the
            Applications of mixing in water treatment include rapid mix
                                                               importance of initial mixing, Babbitt and Doland (1939,
            after the addition of chemicals; disinfection after the addition
                                                               p. 529) did not wholly endorse such a position with the
            of chlorine (or other oxidant); the dispersion of mixed liquor
                                                               following view:
            return activated sludge into the reactor flow; the dispersion of
            an immiscible liquid, e.g., a polymer in oil in a water concen-
                                                                  It is probable that rapid mixing devices for the somewhat
            trate prior to metering into raw water; the dispersion of a
                                                                  violent initial mixing of the chemicals with the raw water
            polymer for sludge thickening; the dispersion of a gas through  will not come into general use, because of their cost, both
            water as small bubbles. In the anaerobic process, advection  for construction and for operation, is not justified by the slight
            mixing predominates, while for the activated sludge process  increase in efficiency of operation. Where low lift pumps are
            the shear rate is higher.                             available, they may serve the purpose without added expense.
   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290