Page 120 - Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS
P. 120

Catchment Basin Analysis of Stream Sediment Anomalies                119















           Fig. 5-1. Spatial distributions of local background element concentrations [(A) Cu, (B) Zn] in
           stream sediments per sample catchment basin estimated via multiple regression analysis (see text;
           Table 5-I). Polygons in thick grey or black outlines in the maps are lithologic units (see Fig. 1-1).



           where Yi represents uni-element concentrations in stream sediment sample i (1,2,…,n)
           and  X ˆ  is the area of each  of  the  j (=1,2,…,m)  lithologic units,  but not their  areal
                 ij
           proportions, in sample catchment basin  i (=1,2,…,n) as in equation (5.4). Prior to
           application of equation (5.5), raw uni-element concentration data showing asymmetric
           empirical density distributions must be appropriately transformed to values  whose
           empirical density distributions are approximately  symmetrical. The statistical
           significance of the value of  M j for each of the  j (=1,2,…,m) lithologic units can be
           inferred from its weighted standard deviation (SD j), which is estimated as:


                    n
            SD j =  (¦ ( Y i −M ) 2 X ˆ  ij ) ¦ n = i 1 X ˆ ij  .              (5.6)
                           j
                    = i 1

           Then, the local background uni-element  concentrations (Y ′ ) due to  j (=1,2,…,m)
                                                              i
           lithologic units in each sample catchment basin i (=1,2,…,n) can be estimated as:

             = ′ Y  m  M  X ˆ  m  X ˆ .                                        (5.7)
            i  ¦ = j 1  j  ij  ¦ = j 1  ij

              Bonham-Carter et al. (1987) have shown that  M j in equation (5.5) and  b o+¦b j in
           equation (5.4) usually have good agreement; that means, there are usually small
           differences  between estimates of  Y′  by  using either equation  (5.4) or equation (5.7).
                                        i
           Only with lithologic units having small areas (about 1% of total area covered by sample
           catchment basins) do large differences between the two methods of estimation occur.
           Nevertheless, the method of estimating weighted  uni-element concentrations in
           lithologic units has an advantage over the multiple regression method because the former
           can be implemented readily in a GIS whilst the latter is usually handled outside a GIS.
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125