Page 121 - Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS
P. 121

120                                                             Chapter 5

             TABLE 5-II

             Mean element concentrations (M j ) in individual lithologic units, in the area shown in Figs. 1-1 and
             5-1, as estimated according to equation (5.5) (see text).

                         Estimated mean element concentrations (M j ; in ppm) in individual lithologic units
                Element
                               Basalt        Limestone      Phyllite      Quartzite
                  Cu           50.4            56.8          47.5           34.1
                  Zn           33.8            73.0          43.8           16.9


                In our example data of Cu and Zn in stream sediment samples, the mean uni-element
             concentrations (M j) in the individual lithologic units (Table 5-II) as estimated according
             to equation (5.5) are more or less similar to the results of the multiple regression analysis
             (Table 5-I), depending on the element examined. These results  demonstrate good
             agreement between  b j in equation (5.4) and  M j in equation  (5.5).  Consequently, the
             spatial distributions of local background Cu and Zn concentrations in stream sediments
             per sample catchment basin as estimated  according to equation (5.7) (Fig. 5-2) are
             similar to the spatial distributions of the local background Cu and Zn concentrations in
             stream sediments per sample catchment basin as estimated according to equation (5.4)
             (Fig. 5-1). The agreement between b j in equation (5.4) and M j in equation (5.5) is further
             verified in the case study below.


             DILUTION CORRECTION OF UNI-ELEMENT RESIDUALS
                Subtraction  of estimated local background  uni-element  concentrations from the
             corresponding  measured  uni-element concentrations results in geochemical residuals
             (i.e.,  Y − Y ′ ), which are either positive or negative. On the one hand, a positive residual
                     i
                  i
             can be interpreted as enrichment of uni-element concentrations in stream sediments due
             to anomalous sources (e.g., mineral deposits). On the other hand, a negative residual can

















             Fig. 5-2. Spatial distributions of local background element concentrations [(A) Cu, (B) Zn] in
             stream sediments per sample catchment basin estimated according  to equation (5.5)  (see  text;
             Table 5-II). Polygons in black outlines in the maps are lithologic units (see Fig. 1-1).
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126