Page 249 - Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS
P. 249

252                                                             Chapter 8

             TABLE 8-II

             Multivariate mathematical models/methods for data-driven mapping of mineral prospectivity.

             Model/method           References to examples
             Discriminant analysis   Chung (1977), Prelat (1977), Bonham-Carter and Chung (1983),
                                    Harris and Pan (1999), Pan and Harris (2000), Harris et al. (2003),
                                    this volume
             Characteristic analysis   Botbol et al. (1977, 1978), McCammon et al. (1983, 1984), Harris
                                    (1984), Pan and Harris (1992a, 2000)
             Logistic regression analysis   Chung (1978, 1983), Chung and Agterberg (1980, 1988),
                                    Bonham-Carter and Chung (1983), Agterberg (1988, 1992, 1993),
                                    Agterberg et al. (1993a), Harris and Pan (1991, 1999), Sahoo and
                                    Pandalai (1999), Pan and Harris (2000), Harris et al. (2001b, 2006),
                                    Carranza and Hale (2001b), Carranza (2002), Harris et al. (2003)
             Favourability analysis   Pan (1989, 1993a, 1993b, 1993c), Pan and Portefield (1995), Pan
                                    and Harris (1992b, 2000)
             Likelihood ratio analysis   Chung and Fabbri (1993), Chung et al. (2002), Chung and Keating
                                    (2002), Chung (2003), Harris and Sanborn-Barrie (2006)
             Artificial neural networks   Singer and Kouda (1996, 1997, 1999), Harris and Pan (1999), Pan
                                    and Harris (2000), Brown et al. (2000, 2003), Bougrain et al.
                                    (2003), Harris et al. (2003), Porwal et al. (2003a, 2004), Rigol-
                                    Sanchez et al. (2003), Harris and Sanborn-Barrie (2006),  Porwal
                                    (2006), Skabar (2005, 2007a, 2007b), Nykänen (2008)
             Bayesian network classifiers  Porwal (2006), Porwal et al. (2006b), Porwal and Carranza (2008)

                                                       2
                In the case study area (covering roughly 130 km ; see Fig. 3-9), there are 13 known
             locations  of epithermal Au deposits and the epithermal  Au  prospectivity recognition
             criteria (defined in Chapter 6) are as follows.
             ƒ  Proximity to NNW-trending faults/fractures (representing structural controls).
             ƒ  Proximity to NW-trending faults/fractures (representing structural controls).
             ƒ  Proximity to intersections of NNW- and NW-trending faults/fractures (representing
                structural controls as well as proxies for heat source controls).
             ƒ  Presence of  multi-element  stream sediment geochemical anomalies (representing
                surficial evidence).
             The spatial data sets used in the case study are:  (a) distance to NNW-trending
             faults/fractures; (b) distance to NW-trending faults/fractures; (c) distance to intersections
             of NNW- and NW-trending faults/fractures; and (d) integrated PC2 and PC3 scores
             obtained from the catchment basin analysis of stream sediment geochemical data (see
             Chapter 5 and Fig. 5-12).
                Before explaining and demonstrating evidential belief  modeling and  discriminant
             analysis of mineral  prospectivity, this chapter first  discusses techniques or strategies
   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254