Page 198 - Global Tectonics
P. 198

184   CHAPTER 7



           different types of load it has been possible to estimate   (Steckler, 1985). Ebinger  et al. (1999) showed that
           the effective long-term elastic thickness (T e ) of continen-  increases in the both T e  and T s  in several rift basins in
           tal lithosphere (Section 2.12) using forward models of   East Africa and elsewhere systematically correspond to

           topography and gravity anomaly profiles (Weissel &   increases in the length of border faults and rift basin
           Karner, 1989; Petit & Ebinger, 2000). The value of T e  in   width. As the border faults grow in size, small faults
           many rifts, such as the Basin and Range, is low (4 km)   form to accommodate the monoclinal bending of the
           due to the weakening effects of high geothermal gradi-  plate into the depression created by slip on the border
           ents. However, in other rifts, including those in East   fault (Fig. 7.25). The radius of curvature of this bend is

           Africa and in the Baikal Rift, the value of  T e  exceeds   a measure of flexural rigidity. Strong plates result in a
           30 km in lithosphere that is relatively strong (Ebinger et   narrow deformation zone with long, wide basins and
           al., 1999). The physical meaning of T e , and its relation-  long border faults that penetrate deeper into the crust.
           ship to the thickness (T s ) of the seismogenic layer, is the   Weak plates result in a very broad zone of deformation
           subject of much discussion. Rheological considerations   with many short, narrow basins and border faults that
           based on data from experimental rock mechanics   do not penetrate very deeply. These studies suggest that

           suggest that T e  refl ects the integrated brittle, elastic, and   the rheology and flexural rigidity of the upper part of
           ductile strength of the lithosphere. It, therefore, is   the lithosphere control several primary features of rift
           expected to differ from the seismogenic layer thickness,   structure and morphology, especially during the fi rst
           which is indicative of the depth to which short term   few million years of rifting. They also suggest that the
           (periods of years) anelastic deformation occurs as   crust and upper mantle may retain considerable strength
           unstable frictional sliding (Watts & Burov, 2003). For   in extension (Petit & Ebinger, 2000).
           these reasons,  T e  typically is larger than  T s  in stable   Lithospheric flexure also plays an important role

           continental cratons and in many continental rifts.  during the formation of large-magnitude normal faults

             The deflection of the crust by slip on normal faults   (Section 7.3). Large displacements on both high- and
           generates several types of vertical loads. A mechanical   low-angle fault surfaces cause isostatic uplift of the foot-
           unloading of the footwall occurs as crustal material in   wall as extension proceeds, resulting in dome-shaped
           the overlying hanging wall is displaced downward and   fault surfaces (Buck et al., 1988; Axen & Bartley, 1997;
           the crust is thinned. This process creates a buoyancy   Lavier et al., 1999; Lavier & Manatschal, 2006). Lavier
           force that promotes surface uplift. Loading of the   & Manatschal (2006) showed that listric fault surfaces
           hanging wall may occur as sediment and volcanic mate-  whose dip angle decreases with depth (i.e. concave
           rial are deposited into the rift basin. These loads combine   upward faults) are unable to accommodate displace-
           with those that are generated during lithospheric   ments large enough (>10 km) to unroof the deep crust.
           stretching (Section 7.6.2). Loads promoting surface   By contrast, low-angle normal faults whose dips increase
           uplift are generated by increases in the geothermal gra-  with depth (i.e. concave downward faults) may unroof
           dient beneath a rift, which leads to density contrasts.   the deep crust efficiently and over short periods of time

           Loads promoting subsidence may be generated by the   if faulting is accompanied by a thinning of the middle
           replacement of thinned crust by dense upper mantle   crust and by the formation of serpentinite in the lower
           and by conductive cooling of the lithosphere if thermal   crust and upper mantle. The thinning and serpentini-
           diffusion outpaces heating.                  zation weaken the crust and minimize the force re-
             Weissel & Karner (1989) showed that fl exural iso-  quired to bend the lithosphere upward during faulting,
           static compensation (Section 2.11.4) following the   allowing large magnitudes of slip.
           mechanical unloading of the lithosphere by normal
           faulting and crustal thinning leads to uplift of the rift
           flanks. The width and height of the uplift depend upon   7.6.5 Strain-induced

           the strength of the elastic lithosphere and, to a lesser
           extent, on the stretching factor (β) and the density of   weakening

           the basin infill. Other factors may moderate the degree
           and pattern of the uplift, including the effects of erosion,   Although differences in the effective elastic thickness
           variations in depth of lithospheric necking (van der   and flexural strength of the lithosphere (Section 7.6.4)

           Beek & Cloetingh, 1992; van der Beek, 1997) and, pos-  may explain variations in the length of border faults and
           sibly, small-scale convection in the underlying mantle   the width of rift basins, they have been much less
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203