Page 309 - Glucose Monitoring Devices
P. 309

316    CHAPTER 15 Automated closed-loop insulin delivery




                         constrained through predictions of the PIC obtained over the prediction horizon.
                         The ability of the adaptive MPC is demonstrated using the multivariable Glucose,
                         Insulin, and Physiological variable simulator (mGIPsim), which is based on a
                         modified Hovorka’s glucose-insulin dynamic model that takes into account the
                         effects of various physical activities. In addition to the CGM values, mGIPsim gen-
                         erates physiological variable signals reported by noninvasive wearable devices.
                         These physiological variables are used to evaluate the ability of the mAP system
                         and compare its performance to that of the conventional single input AP (sAP)
                         system. Aerobic medium-intensity exercises with treadmill and bicycle are used
                         for testing the mAP system. Twenty virtual subjects are simulated for 3 days
                         with varying times and quantities of meals consumed on each day and different
                         types and times of physical activities (Tables 15.1 and 15.2). The meal and phys-
                         ical activity information are not entered manually to the AP, as the AP controller is
                         designed to regulate the BGC in the presence of significant disturbances such as
                         unannounced meals and exercises. The metabolic equivalent of task (MET) values
                         computed by the simulator are used as physiological signals in the recursive system
                         identification technique. To show the efficacy of using physiological signals in the
                         AP system (the mAP case), the sAP case is also considered where no information
                         of physiological signals (MET values) are used in the AP system. The results based
                         on these two different cases (the mAP and sAP) are compared.
                            The evaluations of the closed-loop results based on the mAP and sAP are
                         presented in Figs. 15.4e15.7, and the quantitative metrics for comparing the sAP



                         Table 15.1 Meal scenario for 3-day closed-loop experiment using
                         mGIPsimdthe integrated multivariable metabolic and physiologic simulator.
                                        First day         Second day          Third day
                          Meal     Time   Amount (g)  Time    Amount (g)  Time   Amount (g)
                          Breakfast  7:00  70         8:00    50         7:30    60
                          Lunch    12:00  60          12:30   80         13:00   70
                          Dinner   18:00  50          19:00   60         18:30   80
                          Snack    22:00  30          22:30   25         21:30   20




                         Table 15.2 Exercise scenario for one-hour duration for 3-day closed-loop
                         experiment using mGIPsimdthe integrated multivariable metabolic and
                         physiologic simulator.
                          Exercise   First day         Second day        Third day
                          Morning    Treadmill at 10:30  Bicycling at 09:45  Treadmill at 10:00
                          Afternoon  Bicycling at 16:00  Treadmill at 16:45  Bicycling at 16:15
   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314