Page 239 - Handbook Of Multiphase Flow Assurance
P. 239

238                          10.  Research methods in flow assurance

                           Pressure










                                   hydrates                    hydrates
                                   form                        form

                                                                               error
                               P eq
                                                                               in data

                                                                      hydrates
                                                                      decompose
                                                     hydrates
                                                     decompose




                                0

                                 0                                                  Time

                 FIG. 10.13  Schematic of experimental procedure.

                   When the pressure approached a near-equilibrium value (in several hours), some gas was
                 vented from the system to decrease the system pressure below the expected equilibrium
                 value. The hydrates which had previously formed, dissociated causing the pressure to in-
                 crease and to approach the equilibrium value. After pressure stabilization at some new level,
                 the system pressure was increased again.
                   This process was repeated in successive approximations until the differential between the
                 formation and dissociation pressure reached 1–2% of the absolute pressure, as shown on the
                 right in Fig. 10.13. The arithmetic average of the upper and lower pressure approximations
                 was taken as the equilibrium value.

                 Results and discussion for methane hydrate data
                   The new equilibrium measurements are presented in Table 10.2 and in Fig. 10.14 along with
                 those of previous researchers. The two extremes of our measurements (at 262.4 and 190.15 K)
                 fit smoothly with previous results of Falabella (1975), and Deaton and Frost Jr. (1946), respec-
                 tively. This agreement suggested the validity of the apparatus and experimental procedure.
                 The other values fit smoothly into the temperature gap, as complements to existing data.
                 Reproducibility of the measurements was also determined by duplicate runs at 243, 208, 198,
                 and 190 K, with the largest variation of 2.5% at 198 K.
   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244