Page 475 - Handbook of Battery Materials
P. 475

448  15 Lithiated Carbons

                    formation are more positive than those for the formation of the corresponding com-
                                             +
                    pound Li x C 6 .Atthisstage of Li intercalation the coulombic interaction between
                                        +
                    the lithium guest layer (Li ) and the balancing negative charge distributed over the
                                   −
                    graphene layers (C ) is weak, and space to accommodate large solvent molecules is
                                   n
                    still available [24, 26, 144, 145]. As a further result of the low coulombic interactions,
                    the mobility of the intercalants is high, and therefore the guest distribution among
                    the interlayer spaces is incommensurable or random. Bycontrast,the lithium guests
                    in the binary phase LiC 6 form a commensurable structure, that is, they are organized
                    according to the honeycomb ‘raster’ of the graphene layers [90]. The solvated GICs
                    are thermodynamically unstable with respect to the reduction of the co-intercalated
                    solvent molecules [136]. The kinetically controlled reduction depends on the type
                    of co-intercalated solvent. It is slow for, for example, dimethyl sulfoxide, where
                    even staging of solvated GICs can be observed [138, 146], but very much faster,
                    for example, for PC [63, 137, 147–151], where the electrochemical intercalation
                                                            +
                    followed by fast decomposition of the intercalated Li (solv) y can be misunderstood
                                                                        +
                    as simple electrolyte decomposition. Anyway, the reduction of Li (solv) y inside
                    the graphite is associated with an increase of irreversible losses of charge and of
                    material.
                      Effects resulting from solvent co-intercalation, mechanical destruction, and
                    higher irreversible specific charge losses seriously complicate the operation of
                    graphitic anode materials. Since ternary lithiated carbons are thermodynamically
                    favored at low lithium concentrations in the graphite, that is, at the beginning of
                    intercalation, kinetic measures have to be applied to prevent, or at least suppress,
                    solvent co-intercalation. This can be accomplished by using electrolyte components
                    that form effectively protecting SEI films on the external graphite surfaces in the
                    very early stages of the first reduction, at potentials which are positive relative to the
                    potentials of a significant formation of Li x (solv) y C n .The first [65],and for a long
                    time the only, effective solvent in this respect seemed to be ethylene carbonate (EC)
                    [136, 152, 153]. Since the viscosity of electrolytes based on pure EC is rather high,
                    mixtures of EC with low viscosity solvents such as dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and
                    diethyl carbonate (DEC) are widely used [154–159]. Several papers which report on
                    investigations and applications of these electrolyte blends are compiled in recent
                    reviews [2, 6].
                      Although the formation of binary Li–GICs prevails in EC-based electrolytes,
                    many investigations indicate a mechanism of film formation in which solvated
                    lithiated graphites also participate. Film formation in the first cycle during the
                    first reduction of the host material due to electrolyte decomposition is not a
                    simple surface reaction but a rather complex three-dimensional process, taking
                    place basically at a potential of ∼1to ∼0.8 V vs Li/Li +  (Figure 15.7a). In-situ
                    dilatometric [152], scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) [160, 161] and Raman
                    [106] methods indicate a (fairly large) expansion of the graphite host corresponding
                    to the (intermediate) formation of Li x (solv) y C n at those potentials. The reduction
                    of Li x (solv) y on parts of the internal surfaces between the graphene layers results in
                    an ‘extra’ film, which penetrates into the bulk of the graphite host (Figure 15.9).
                    Correspondingly ‘extra’ irreversible charge losses are observed [152]. Several other
   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480