Page 426 - High Power Laser Handbook
P. 426

394    So l i d - S t at e   La s e r s                                                                          The National Ignition Facility Laser    395


                                              SHG          THG output (kJ)
                                       SSD    input
                  Shot          CPP    (GHz)  (kJ)   Measured  Model   Delta (%)
                  N060214-002   –        0    3.759  2.920     2.9072  –0.44
                  N060216-003   –       65.8  3.644  2.668     2.7122   1.66
                  N060216-002   –       95.2  3.721  2.477     2.4640  –0.52
                  N060224-001   1MJ      0    3.672  2.925     2.9325   0.26
                  N060224-002   1MJ     96.7  3.668  2.462     2.4551  –0.28
                  N060313-001   1.8MJ    0    3.553  2.656     2.7120   2.11
                  N060314-002   1.8MJ   37.2  3.757  2.667     2.7336   2.50
                  N060314-001   1.8MJ   94.8  3.766  2.367     2.3871   0.85

                 Table 14.5  Comparison Between Modeled and Measured Frequency Converter
                 Performance




                      an effective tripler detuning of 1.9 μrad/GHz, assuming quadrature
                      addition  of  the  3-  and  17-GHz  spectra.  Off-line  time-dependent
                      plane-wave calculations have validated that this treatment is accu-
                      rate over a wide range of input power. In all cases, the model is
                      within 2.5 percent of measurement.


                      14.6.4  Temporal Pulse Shaping
                      The ignition campaign plan calls for a high-contrast, frequency-
                      tripled temporal pulse shape, with all beam-conditioning techniques
                      in place, to be specified and controlled to an rms deviation over the
                      48 NIF quads of less than or equal to 15 percent in the foot of the
                      pulse and to less than or equal to 3 percent at the peak of the pulse. A
                      precision pulse-shaping sequence was performed to test how well the
                      current  NIF  hardware  can  generate  the  requested  pulses  and  to
                      develop a strategy for routinely matching them with high accuracy.
                      Figure 14.27 shows the requested pulse shapes for the current 1-MJ
                      and the 1.8-MJ baseline target drives.
                         The LPOM code is the first and primary tool used to determine
                      the  required  setup  pulse  shape  at  the  MOR.  It  uses  its  calibrated
                      model of the state of all individual components, along with a solver
                      capability  built  into  its  propagation/extraction  code  (VBL)  to  per-
                      form a first-principles numerical solution. As a side benefit of this
                      solution, LPOM predicts the expected pulse shape that will be mea-
                      sured at the ISP and the OSP. For FIT pulse shapes, we have found
                      this solution to be very accurate. For precise control of high ampli-
                      tude-contrast  pulses,  we  have  developed  an  iterative  operational
   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431