Page 263 - How To Implement Lean Manufacturing
P. 263

Using the Pr escription—Thr ee Case Studies     241



                                                    Line 7        Line 9        Line 3
                      Total Production              +9.2%         +18.8%        +6.3%
                      Quality Yield Improvements    +2.0%         +2.6%         +0.0%
                      Cycle-Time Reductions         5.5%          15.8%         3.9%
                      Capital Investment            $0            $0            $0


                    TABLE 16-3  Progress after the First Eight-Week Plan

                       The Initiative took off, everyone knew their role, and progress was made almost
                    instantly. This goal-setting, implementation of  kaizen activities, and follow-up were
                    steps 6, 7, and 8 of the prescription. In short order, we had made a great deal of progress.
                    Tables 16-3 and 16-4 shows our results after the completion of the first and third eight
                    week plans.

                    Comments on the Results
                    So just how did they improve? Well, immediately upon implementing the OEE initia-
                    tive, process variation began to show improvements. Not only did quality yield rise,
                    but line cycle times improved. The assigned process engineers had individual work
                    plans and executed them with energy. The engineers grew with the implementation.
                    Problem solving became a way of life with root causes found and eliminated. We devel-
                    oped and defined a structured continuous improvement methodology and it was
                    employed throughout the plant. The processes were showing improvements and the
                    short-term gains were sustained. It was a joy to be a small part of this effort.
                       This means that:
                        •  With the same staff, the same machinery, and the same raw materials, these
                           three lines could now produce, on average, 24 percent more product. The per-
                           unit cost dropped dramatically. Most of the extra product which they made,
                           they could sell—where they had no incremental demand, they were now able
                           to run the lines fewer hours per week.
                        •  On Line 9, their monthly demand was 1,000,000 units when we started, which
                           could not be met—even when they worked 24/7. Now the demand could be met
                           working only five days per week, with a resultant huge savings in manpower
                           and overhead.



                                                 Line 7         Line 9         Line 3
                      Total Production           +27.01%        +42.8%         +11.7%
                      Quality Yield Improvements  +8.1%         +5.73%         +0.63%
                      Cycle-Time Reductions      16.4%          23.5%          3.9%
                      Capital Investment         $0             $0             $0

                    TABLE 16-4  Progress after the Third Eight-Week Plan
   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268