Page 265 - How To Implement Lean Manufacturing
P. 265

Using the Pr escription—Thr ee Case Studies     243



                                                          Line 7      Line 9      Line 3
                      Operational Improvements
                      Cycle time—Week 12 (secs)           6.10          6.65        5.20
                      Cycle time—Week 35 (secs)           5.10          5.09        5.00
                      Achievable cycle time (secs) ∗∗     4.40          4.20        4.50
                      OEE Week 12                         79.00%      76.24%       81.17%
                      OEE Week 35                         89.83%      84.31%       88.68%
                      Achievable OEE ∗∗                   96.00%      96.00%       96.00%
                      Production Gains (units/month)
                      Monthly salable units—Week 12         812,930     724,559   1,274,778
                      Monthly salable units—Week 35       1,032,475   1,034,748   1,423,667
                      Monthly achievable salable units    1,354,579   1,419,083   1,765,970
                      Gains—First 24 Weeks (Wk 12—Wk 35)    219,544     310,189     148,889
                      Additional achievable gains ∗∗        322,105     384,335     342,303

                    ∗ Based on 6 days per week
                    ∗∗ Achievable without any major capital investments
                    TABLE 16-5  Gains and Achievable Gains


                    Now lines 3 and 7 are also ready for quantity control activities. It is time to apply the
                    Four Strategies to Becoming Lean (described in detail in Chap. 6), modify the plan, and
                    have some more fun.

                    So What Is “the Rest of the Story” Behind This Success?
                    How did they achieve these huge gains despite the plant’s weaknesses?
                       You have seen the results. To me, these results were not surprising—pleasant for
                    sure, but not surprising. I was not surprised because, in the first case, we had properly
                    addressed the three fundamental issues of cultural change. The plant manager pro-
                    vided excellent leadership, in spite of his inexperience. The staff was and remained
                    highly motivated throughout. Finally, there was a nucleus of problem solvers to work
                    with. With those basics in place, there is always a decent chance of success.
                       Next, the implementation went well as we followed “The Prescription,” as outlined
                    in Chap. 8. There was a good leader and a sensei, we made an assessment using the
                    assessment tools from Chap. 19, and utilized the assessment to create our plan. Next,
                    we deployed the plan and turned it into “worker level” goals. This, coupled with some
                    JIT training, fueled the effort and the results speak for themselves.
                       What about the obstacles and plant weaknesses we mentioned earlier, with all this
                    going against it, just how did the plant achieve all these gains?
                       The answer to that is simple. Excellent leadership with a good  sensei working
                    together is the key to success. I cannot say enough about the leadership that Kermit
                    supplied. He showed not only the intelligence and honesty to grasp the situation and
                    see what could be done, he also showed the courage and character required in these
                    stressful situations. He is an impressive young man. Couple that with a good plan,
   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270