Page 331 - Hydrogeology Principles and Practice
P. 331

HYDC08  12/5/05  5:32 PM  Page 314






                 314    Chapter Eight


                 Table 8.3 Scenarios of climate and groundwater use change effects considered for the Edwards Aquifer, south-central Texas. After
                 Loáiciga (2003).
                              Scenario
                              I             II                 III                   IV
                              Base          Climate change effect  Groundwater use change effect  Total effects
                 Climate (recharge)  R 1978–89 *  R 1978–89 (2 × CO /1 × CO )†  R 1978–89 *  R 1978–89 (2 × CO /1 × CO )
                                                                                               2
                                                                                                     2
                                                     2
                                                           2
                 Groundwater use  1978–1989 use‡  1978–1989 use  2050 use§           2050 use
                                                          3 −1
                                                        9
                 * Historical recharge (R) during 1978–1989 (mean = 0.949 × 10 m a ).
                 † Historical recharge scaled to 2 × CO climate conditions.
                                        2
                                                         9
                                                            3 −1
                 ‡ Average groundwater use between 1978 and 1989 = 0.567 × 10 m a .
                                               9
                                                  3 −1
                 § Groundwater use forecast for 2050 = 0.784 × 10 m a .
                 wet and unusually dry. Estimated recharge in the  hydrology to provide future recharge values which
                 basin was found to be sensitive to climatic variability  were then used as input to a numerical groundwater
                 in the historical record, especially the precipitation  flow model. The scenarios and model results are
                 variability. For GCM-projected climate changes to  shown in Tables 8.3 and 8.4 and summarize the
                 carbon dioxide doubling, the variability in the esti-  effects on spring flows in the Edwards Aquifer. In the
                 mated annual recharge was less than that estimated  Comal Springs and, to a lesser extent, the San Marcos
                 from the historic data. In addition, the median annual  Springs, there is a simulated increase in spring flow
                 recharge, for the case of a climate scenario averaged  under a doubling of CO for an unchanged ground-
                                                                                2
                 from three different GCM simulation runs, was less  water use condition (Scenario II). For the case of
                 than 75% of the median annual recharge for the his-  Scenario III (base climate and increased groundwater
                 torical simulation. This large change reflects the  use) there are negative impacts on spring flow.
                 potential importance of climate on groundwater  Combining the effects of both climate change and
                 recharge.                                   increased groundwater use (Scenario IV) simulates a
                   In a more recent study, Loáiciga et al. (2000) and  serious depletion of 73% in spring flow for the Comal
                 Loáiciga (2003) generated climate change scenarios  springs but only a marginal decrease (1%) for the
                 from scaling factors derived from several GCMs to  San Marcos springs. This study highlights that the
                 assess the likely impacts of aquifer pumping on the  primary threat to groundwater use in the Edwards
                 water resources of the Edwards Balcones Fault Zone  Aquifer is from the potential rise in groundwater use
                 aquifer system in south-central Texas. This karst  caused by population growth and not from climate
                 aquifer, formed in the Edwards limestone formation,  change, although protracted droughts under climate
                 is one of the most productive regional aquifers in the  change will accentuate the competition between
                 United States and is a primary source of agricultural  human and ecological water uses. Hence, and as con-
                 and municipal water supplies. The Edwards Aquifer  cluded by Loáiciga (2003), aquifer strategies in the
                 has been identified as one of the regional catchments  Edwards Aquifer must be adapted to climate variabil-
                 most vulnerable to climate change impacts in the  ity and climate change.
                 United States. Groundwater recharge to the aquifer  Uncertainty is inherent in the development of cli-
                 takes place almost exclusively as stream seepage,  mate change scenarios due to unknown future emis-
                 with groundwater discharge directed to major  sions of ‘greenhouse’ gases and aerosols, uncertain
                 springs that support an important and threatened  global climate sensitivity and the difficulty of simulat-
                 groundwater ecosystem. To explore the vulnerability  ing the regional characteristics of climate change. It is
                 of these springs to combined pumping and climate  because of these uncertainties that the regional
                 change impacts, several pumping scenarios were  changes in climate derived from GCM experiments
                 combined with 2 × CO climate scenarios. The clim-  are termed scenarios or projections and cannot be
                                   2
                 ate change scenarios were linked to the surface  considered predictions. Comprehensive reviews of
   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336