Page 140 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 140

112    Improving Machinery Reliability

                     dence of  resonances with the excitation sources over a wide speed range; therefore,
                     stress calculations must be made to evaluate the adequacy of the system response.

                     Reciprocating Machinery. For reciprocating units such as compressors, pumps, or
                     engines, the harmonic excitation torques must be calculated and applied at the appro-
                     priate shaft location to calculate the stresses.25
                     Allowable Torsional Stresses. The calculated torsional stresses must be compared
                     to applicable criteria. The allowable values  given  by  Military  Standard  164 are
                      appropriate for most rotating equipment. The allowable zero-peak endurance limit is
                     equal to the ultimate  tensile  strength  divided  by  25. The MIL  Spec uses  this as a
                     global derating factor rather than  calculating on  the basis  of  individual  factors
                     accounting  for keyways,  surface roughness  effects,  and the like. When comparing
                     calculated  stresses  to this  value,  the appropriate stress concentration factor and a
                      safety factor must be used. Generally, a safety factor of 2 is used for fatigue analysis.
                      When these factors are used, it can be shown that fairly low levels of torsional stress
                     can cause failures, especially  when  it is observed  that the standard keyway  (USA
                      Standard ANSI B17.1) has a stress concentration factor of 3.
                       We should  not lose sight of  the fact that process  machinery  is expected  to  live
                      much  longer than military hardware,  and that our process  machinery manufacturer
                      has, perhaps:
                        1. no S-N curves
                        2. no intention of applying individual derating factors for either known stress rais-
                         ers or unknown superimposed stresses
                        3. no interest in determining coupling and misalignment-induced stress adders, etc.,
                        It would  thus  be reasonable  to use  a global derating  value  of  75, and, indeed,
                      world-class  turbomachinery  manufacturers  such as Elliott,  Dresser-Rand,  Mannes-
                      mann-Demag, Sulzer, Mitsubishi, and surely many others, have both the experience
                      and  analytical  capability  to virtually  guarantee  unlimited  life of  turbomachinery
                      shafts operating at relatively much higher mean torsional stresses. A typical example
                      would be steam turbine shafts with tensile strengths of  105,000 psi (ult.) and steady-
                      state torsional stresses of  10,900 psi, where this latter stress simply uses the standard
                      calculation formula




                        Nevertheless, 2,,,,/75  is not at all unreasonable for machines built by  the “other”
                      manufacturers.  A  midwestern U.S. plant uses rotary blowers direct-coupled to 200
                      hp,  1800 rpm  motors. The blowers  came with 2% inch diameter  shafts that  had  an
                      ultimate  strength in tension of  80,000 psi. Although nominal stresses are thus only
                      2281 psi, the plant experienced many  shaft failures with derating values as high as
                      80,000/2281 = 35. A typical torsional stress allowable thus becomes the ultimate ten-
                      sile strength divided by 75.
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145