Page 244 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 244

Machiizery Reliability Audits arid Reviews   215


                         63,000 x 7,000
                     T=              = 98,000 lb-in.
                             4,500
                   while its maximum allowable torque value would be

                         7,,nd3
                      T=--     - 125,664 ib-in.
                           16
                   or about  199 hp/100 rpm. The maximum allowable  torque expression in  this case
                   uses zn, = 18,000 psi, the generally accepted "safe  allowable" torsional mean stress
                   for AIS1 4140.
                     The more conservative approach would be  to select a coupling for the higher of
                   the two torque values. The hub fit-up dimensions would then logically be chosen to
                   allow slip-free transmission of the higher torque.
                     Finally, it should be recognized that there is a certain degree of design conservatism
                   in calculating  maximum  allowable  torque from Equation  3-7 and using 5,000 psi,
                    10,000 psi, and  11,000 psi  as maximum allowable torsional mean stresses for AIS1
                    1040, 4140, and 4340 steels, respectively. This conservatism may  vanish if  the com-
                   bined  action  of  stress concentrations at fillets, superimposed alternating torsional
                    stresses, or alternating bending stresses from inadequate coupling designs should cause
                   the combined stresses to go 30% + over the maximum allowable values. In such cases
                    a Soderberg analysis may be used to more closely establish shaft factors of ~afety.4~3~~

                   Torsional Holding Ability Can Be Calculated

                     The torque required to cause complete slippage of a press fit is given by

                      T = [y p)L  d2                                            (3 - 8)


                    where p is the coefficient of friction, p the unit press-fit pressure between shaft and
                    hub, L the length of the hub bore, and d the nominal shaft diameter."7
                     Using the widely accepted average value of 0.12 for the coefficient of fri~tion?~,~*
                    Figure  3-89 was plotted to show the relationship between  torsional holding ability
                    (or requirement),  press-fit  pressures,  and coupling-bore dimensions. The press-fit
                    pressures  refer to ratios of  shaft diameter over hub diameter d/D, and interference
                    fits. Figure  3-90 illustrates  this  relationship  which  is based  on  the  mathematical
                    expression for press-fit contact pressures of steel hubs on solid steel shafts:





                    In this formula, e represents the total diametral interference and E is the modulus of
                    elasticity for   Alternatively, contact pressure could be expressed as a function
                    of  the interference rate i. This rate equals the diametral interference divided by  the
                    shaft diameter; e.g., in./in. or mdmm:
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249